The Crossing Speed of Elderly Pedestrians
Abstract
The population of elderly people is rapidly growing and in terms of safety, senior pedestrians represent one of the most vulnerable group. The pedestrian crossing speed is a significant input parameter in traffic engineering, which can have effect on pedestrians’ safety, especially of older population. The objective of this study was to determine the value of the crossing speed of elderly pedestrians (65+) for different types of urban crossings. The research was conducted at ten intersections in the city of Belgrade, Serbia, using the method of direct observation and a questionnaire for collecting data. The data were analysed in the statistical software package IBM SPSS Statistics. The results showed that elderly pedestrians walk slower and the crossing type significantly influenced the speed of older population. The order of crossing types in relation to the measured speed is ranked as follows, from the lowest to the highest speed value: unsignalized, signalized, signalized with pedestrian countdown display, signalized with pedestrian island and pedestrian countdown display and finally signalized crossing with pedestrian island. According to the questionnaire results, the elderly recognize the importance of implementing pedestrian counters. This indicates the necessity to provide safe street crossing for the elderly using the corresponding engineering measures.References
RTSA. Traffic Safety for Older People, Fact sheet. Road Traffic Safety Agency, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia; 2015.
Keall MD. Pedestrian exposure to risk of road accident in New Zealand. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1995;27(5):729-740.
Transport Canada. Pedestrian Fatalities and Injuries 1988-1997, Fact Sheet. Ottawa, Ontario: Transport Canada; 2001.
Hauer E. The safety of older persons at intersections. Transportation in an Aging Society 2. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 1988. p. 194-252.
OECD. Ageing and transport: Mobility needs and safety issues. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France; 2001.
Tourniera I, Dommes A, Cavallo V. Review of safety and mobility issues among older pedestrians. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2016;91:24-35.
Gates TJ, Noyce DA, Bill AR, Van Ee N. Recommended walking speeds for timing of pedestrian clearance intervals based on characteristics of the pedestrian population. Transportation Research Record 1982. Washington: Natl Acad Sci; 2006. p. 38-47.
Stollof ER, McGee H, Eccles KA. Pedestrian Signal Safety for Older Person. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; 2007.
Fitzpatrick K, Brewer MA, Turner S. Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. TCRP D-08, NCHRP 3-71; 2005.
Tarawneh MS. Evaluation of Pedestrian Speed in Jordon with Investigation of Some Contributing Factors, Journal of Safety Research. 2001;32(2):229-236.
Coffin A, Morrall J. Walking speed of elderly pedestrians at crosswalks. Transportation Research Record. 1995;1487:63-67.
York I, Ball S, Beesley R, Webster D, Knight P, Hopkin J. Pedestrian Countdown at Traffic Signal Junctions (PCaTS) – Road Trial. Project Record: TflL2481. Transport Research Laboratory; 2011.
Schmitz JN. The effects of pedestrian countdown timers on safety and efficiency of operations at signalized intersections. Civil Engineering Theses, Dissertations and Student Research, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2011.
Moeinaddini M, Asadi-Shekari Z, Sultan Z, Zaly Shah M. Analyzing the relationships between the number of deaths in road accidents and the work travel mode choice at the city level. Safety Science. 2015;72:249-254.
Zegeer CV, Stutts JC, Huang H, Zhou M. Analysis of elderly pedestrian accidents and recommended countermeasures. Transportation Research Record. 1993;1405:56-63.
Davies DG. Research, Development, and Implementation of Pedestrian Safety Facilities in the United Kingdom. Federal Highway Administration; 1999.
Bernhoft IM, Carstensen G. Preferences and behaviour of pedestrians and cyclists by age and gender. Transportation Research Part F. 2008;11:83-95.
Asadi-Shekari Z, Moeinaddini M, Shah MZ. Pedestrian safety index for evaluating street facilities in urban areas. Safety Science. 2015;74:1-14.
Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies. Washington, DC: Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2000.
Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board; 2010.
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation; 2003.
Montufar J, Rempel G, Klassen S. Pedestrian Walking Speed for Traffic Operations and Safety in Canada. Transportation Association of Canada; 2013.
Dahlstedt S. Walking speeds and walking habits of elderly people. International Conference on Transport for the Elderly and Handicapped. Cambridge: Loughborough University of Technology; 1978. p. 243-249.
Knoblauch RL, Pietrucha MT, Nitzburg M. Field studies of pedestrian walking speed and start-up time. Transportation Research Record. 1996;1538:27-38.
Wilson DG, Grayson GB. Age-related differences in the road crossing behaviour of adult pedestrians. Transport and Road Research Digest. LR 933. Crowthorne: Transport and Road Research Laboratory; 1980.
Avineri E, Shinar D, Susilo Y. Pedestrians behaviour in cross walks: The effects of fear of falling and age. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2012;44(1):30-34.
Lipovac K, Vujanic M, Maric B, Nesic M. The influence of a pedestrian countdown display on pedestrian behavior at signalized pedestrian crossings. Transportation Research Part F. 2013;20:121-134.
Xu Y, Li Y, Zhang F. Pedestrians’ intention to jaywalk: automatic or planned? A study based on a dual-process model in China. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013;50:811-819.
Koh PP, Wong YD, Chandrasekar P. Safety evaluation of pedestrian behaviour and violations at signalised pedestrian crossings. Safety Science. 2014;70:143-152.
Belanger-Bonneau H, Lamothe F, Rannou A, Joly MF, Bergeron J, Breton JG, Laberge Nadeau C, Maug U. Project d’experimentation et d’e´valuation d’une signalisation numerique pietionnie`re: Le de´compte visuel. Montreal, Canada: Unite´ de Sante´ Publique, Hopital du Sacre´-Coeur de Montre´al, Centre de Recherche sur les Transport; 1994. French.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
