Characteristics of Everyday Leisure Trips by Car in Sweden – Implications for Sustainability Measures
Abstract
In search for measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport, insights into the characteristics of all sorts of trips and specifically trips by car are needed. This paper focuses on everyday leisure trips for social and recreational purposes. Travel behaviour for these purposes is analysed considering individual and household factors as well as properties of the trip, based on Swedish national travel survey data. The analysis reveals that everyday leisure trips are often of joint character and that the average distance travelled per person and day increases with, for example, income, cohabitation, children in the household and residence in rural areas. The result also shows that the studied characteristics vary between studied trip purposes, influencing the sustainability potential of a reduction in car use and suggested measures. For instance, the largest share of passenger mileage comes from social trips, whereas trips for exercise and outdoor life have the largest share of car trips below 5 km. Several characteristics indicate difficulties in transferring trips by car to, for example, bicycle or public transport due to convenience, economy, start times, company etc. The study indicates that there is a need to take a broader view of the effective potential.
References
Masson-Delmotte V, et al. (eds.) Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
IEA. Tracking clean energy progress 2017. Paris, France: IEA; 2017. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/580c0f94-0db8-4dc8-9947-66720737cb3a/TrackingCleanEnergyProgress2017.pdf [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
European Environment Agency. The European environment - State and outlook 2015. Cross-country comparisons. Copenhagen, Denmark: EEA; 2015. https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer/2015 [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
Winslott Hiselius L, Smidfelt Rosqvist L. Segmentation of the current levels of passenger mileage by car in the light of sustainability targets – The Swedish case. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;182: 331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.072.
De Haas M, Faber R, Hamersma M. How COVID-19 and the Dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2020;6. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150.
Borkowski P, Jażdżewska-Gutta M, Szmelter-Jarosz A. Lockdowned: Everyday mobility changes in response to COVID-19. Journal of Transport Geography. 2021;90: 102906. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102906.
Bin E, Andruetto C, Susilo Y, Pernestål A. The trade-off behaviours between virtual and physical activities during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic period. European Transport Research Review. 2021;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00473-7.
Geng D, Innes J, Wu W, Wang G. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on urban park visitation: A global analysis. Journal of Forestry Research. 2021;32(2): 553-567. doi: 10.1007/s11676-020-01249-w.
Li A, et al. How did micro-mobility change in response to COVID-19 pandemic? A case study based on spatial-temporal-semantic analytics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2021;90: 101703. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101703.
Vercoe S, McGowan K, Partalis P. COVID-19 travel & leisure insights. Summary presentation, 4 June 2020. Tourism & Transport Forum, Newgate Research, Australia; 2020. https://www.ttf.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/TTF-Travel-Sentiment-Survey.pdf [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
Le HTK, Carrel AL, Shah H. Impacts of online shopping on travel demand: A systematic review. Transport Reviews. 2022;42(3): 273-295. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2021.1961917.
Åkerman J. Transport systems meeting long-term climate targets: A backcasting approach. PhD thesis. KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm; 2011. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A396982&dswid=-9070 [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
Gössling S, et al. Desirable transport futures. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2018;61: 301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.008.
Kamb A, Lundberg E, Larsson J, Nilsson J. Potentials for reducing climate impact from tourism transport behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2021;29(8): 1365-1382. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1855436.
Winslott Hiselius L, Smidfelt Rosqvist L. Mobility Management campaigns as part of the transition towards changing social norms on sustainable travel behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;123: 34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.055.
Brand C, Anable J, Morton C. Lifestyle, efficiency and limits: Modelling transport energy and emissions using a socio-technical approach. Energy Efficiency. 2019;12(1): 187-207. doi: 10.1007/s12053-018-9678-9.
ELTIS. The Urban Mobility Observatory. https://www.eltis.org/format/database [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
Ettema D, Schwanen T. A relational approach to analysing leisure travel. Journal of Transport Geography. 2012;24: 173-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.023.
Davies NJ, Weston R. Reducing car-use for leisure: Can organised walking groups switch from car travel to bus and train walks? Journal of Transport Geography. 2015;48: 23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.08.009.
Transport Analysis. Travel surveys as input to passenger transport models – problems, possibilities and future needs in Sweden and Norway. [Resvaneundersökningar som indata till persontransportmodeller - problem, möjligheter och framtida behov i Sverige och Norge]. Report 2016:21, 2016. https://www.trafa.se/globalassets/rapporter/2016/rapport-2016_21-resvaneundersokningar-som-indata-till-persontransportmodeller--problem-mojligheter-och-framtida-behov-i-sverige-och-norge.pdf [Accessed 25 Mar. 2022].
Eurostat. Energy, transport and environment statistics – 2020 edition. Luxembourg, Belgium; European Union; 2020. doi: 10.2785/522192.
LaMondia J, Snell T, Bhat CR. Traveler behavior and values analysis in the context of vacation destination and travel mode choices: European Union case study. Transportation Research Record. 2010;2156(1): 140-149. doi: 10.3141/2156-16
Scott D, Gössling S, Hall CM. Tourism and climate change: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2012.
Böhler S, Grischkat S, Haustein S, Hunecke M. Encouraging environmentally sustainable holiday travel. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2006;40(8): 652-670. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.006.
Dubois G, Peeters P, Ceron J-P, Gössling S. The future tourism mobility of the world population: Emission growth versus climate policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2011;45(10): 1031-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2009.11.004.
Große J, Fertner C, Carstensen TA. Compensatory leisure travel? The role of urban structure and lifestyle in weekend and holiday trips in Greater Copenhagen. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2019;7(1): 108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2018.12.004.
Anable J. Picnics, pets and pleasant places: The distinguishing characteristics of leisure travel demand. In: Black W, Nijkamp P. (eds.) Social change and sustainable transport. Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press; 2002. p. 181-190.
Schlich R, Schönfelder S, Hanson S, Axhausen KW. Structures of leisure travel: Temporal and spatial variability. Transport Reviews. 2004;24(2): 219-237. doi: 10.1080/0144164032000138742.
Stauffacher M, Schlich R, Axhausen KW, Scholz R. The diversity of travel behaviour: Motives and social interactions in leisure time activities. IVT, ETH Zürich. Working paper 328, 2005. doi: 10.3929/ethz-a-005230691.
Melamed S, Meir EI, Samson A. The benefits of personality-leisure
congruence: Evidence and implications. Journal of Leisure Research. 1995;27(1): 25-40. doi: 10.1080/00222216.1995.11969975.
Brajša-Žganec A, Merkaš M, Šverko I. Quality of life and leisure activities: How do leisure activities contribute to subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research. 2011;102(1): 81-91. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9724-2.
Iwasaki Y. Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: What are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Social Indicators Research. 2007;82(2): 233-264. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9032-z.
Hamilton-Smith E. To leisure or not to leisure. Youth Studies. 1990;9(4): 12-18.
Holden E, Linnerud K. Troublesome leisure travel: The contradictions of three sustainable transport policies. Urban Studies. 2011;48(14): 3087-3106. doi: 10.1177/0042098010396234.
Holden E, Linnerud K. Troublesome leisure travel: Counterproductive sustainable transport policies. In: Hickman R, Givoni M, Bonilla D, Banister D. (eds.) Handbook on transport and development. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2015. p. 587-598. doi: 10.4337/9780857937261.00047.
Kroesen M, Handy S, Chorus C. Do attitudes cause behavior or vice versa? An alternative conceptualization of the attitude-behavior relationship in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2017;101: 190-202. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.013.
Kroesen M, Chorus C. The role of general and specific attitudes in predicting travel behavior – A fatal dilemma? Travel Behaviour and Society. 2018;10: 33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2017.09.004.
Frank L, et al. Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation. 2008;35(1): 37-54. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9136-6.
De Vos J. Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018;117: 261-274. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.034.
Malhado ACM, Rothfuss R. Transporting 2014 FIFA World Cup to sustainability: Exploring residents’ and tourists’ attitudes and behaviours. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. 2013;5(3): 252-269. doi: 10.1080/19407963.2013.801159.
Abdulrazzaq LR, et al. Traffic congestion: Shift from private car to public transportation. Civil Engineering Journal. 2020;6(8): 1547-1554. doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091566.
Hyun K, Naz F, Cronley C, Leat S. User characteristics of shared-mobility: A comparative analysis of car-sharing and ride-hailing services. Transportation Planning and Technology. 2021;44(4): 436-447. doi: 10.1080/03081060.2021.1919351.
Tilahun N, Levinson D. Contacts and meetings: Location, duration and distance traveled. Travel Behaviour and Society. 2017;6: 64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2016.06.002.
Greaves S, et al. A web-based diary and companion smartphone app for travel/activity surveys. Transportation Research Procedia. 2015;11: 297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2015.12.026.
Statistics Sweden. RVU Sweden 2011-16. https://www.trafa.se/en/travel-survey/travel-survey/ [Accessed 28th Jan. 2020].
Statistics Sweden. Official statistics of Sweden – Annual Report. 2016. https://www.scb.se/contentassets/c1dc2a4307cb4431b6ef4becd184b569/ov9999_2016a01_br_x43br1701eng.pdf [Accessed 25th Mar. 2022].
Harms L. Mostly mobile - The living conditions and mobility of Dutch people [Overwegend onderweg – De leefsituatie en de mobiliteit van Nederlanders]. The Hague, Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (SCP); 2008.
McGuckin N, Fucci A. Summary of travel trends: 2017 National household travel survey. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Report number: FHWA-PL-18-019, 2018. https://nhts.ornl.gov/assets/2017_nhts_summary_travel_trends.pdf [Accessed 25 Mar. 2022].
Norheim B. Public transport. Challenges, opportunities and solutions for urban areas. [Kollektivtrafik. Utmaningar, möjligheter och lösningar för tätorter]. K2, Statens vegvesen, Urbanet Analyse. Lund, Sweden: Lunds universitet, Media-Tryck; 2017. https://www.k2centrum.se/sites/default/files/fields/field_bifogad_fil/kollektivtrafik_utmaningar_mojligheter_och_losningar_for_tatorter.pdf [Accessed 25 Mar. 2022].
Ho C, Mulley C. Intra-household interactions in tour-based mode choice: The role of social, temporal, spatial and resource constraints. Transport Policy. 2015;38: 52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.12.001.
Copyright (c) 2022 Emma Strömblad, Lena Winslott Hiselius, Lena Smidfelt Rosqvist, Helena Svensson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
