Major Barriers in Adoption of Electric Trucks in Logistics System

  • Muhammad Qasim Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering
  • Dr. habil. Csiszár Csaba Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering
Keywords: logistics system, electric truck, adoption, incentive, total cost of ownership


The article analyses the issues concerning the reluctance of logistics professionals to adopt medium-sized electric trucks (ET) in the logistics system. Logistics trucks are oversized polluters, considered to be one of the hardest to be addressed for the reduction of CO2 emissions. It aims to identify the major barriers hindering the spread of ETs in logistics. The total cost of ownership (TCO) comparison between a traditional and electric truck has revealed the price gap at the end of a useful lifecycle is marginal. Incentivisation can bridge the gap. This research was based on a survey conducted among professionals from the logistics field in Budapest. Responses recorded were analysed by descriptive statistics to identify highly-rated barriers and their priorities. Based on the results, recommendations were suggested to facilitate the adoption of ETs.


ACEA. Paper – CO2 emissions from heavy-duty vehicles – Preliminary CO2 baseline. European Automobile Manufacturer Association. Report number: Q3-Q4, 2019.

Graichen J. Targets for the non-ETS sectors in 2040 and 2050. Öko-Institute; 2016.

EU Transport in Figures - Statistical Pocketbook. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport; 2017.

Ruesch M, Petz C. E-Commerce and urban freight distribution (home shopping): Best practice update. BESTUFS II, Deliverable D 2.4 Part I, 2008.

Davis BA, Figliozzi MA. A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2013;49(10): 8-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.003

Melo S, Baptista P, Costa Á. Comparing the use of small sized electric vehicles with diesel vans on city logistics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;111: 350-359. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.068

Grünjes HG, Birkner M. Electromobility for heavy-duty vehicles (HDV): the Siemens eHighway System. In: HVTT12 – 12th International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Transport Technology, 16-19 Sep. 2012, Stockholm, Sweden; 2012. p. 922-927.

Van Rooijen T, Quak H. City Logistics in the European CIVITAS Initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;125: 312-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1476

Feng W, Figliozzi MA. An economic and technological analysis of the key factors affecting the competitiveness of electric commercial vehicles: A case study from the USA market. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2013;26: 135-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.06.007

Best Practice Factory for freight transport. 7th RTD Framework Programme; 2011.

Calvo Ambel C, et al. Roadmap to climate-friendly land freight and buses in Europe. Brussles (SE): Transport & Environment; 2017. 36 p. Available from:

Nicolaides D, Cebon D, Miles J. Prospects for Electrification of Road Freight. IEEE Syst Journal. 2018;2(12): 1838-1849. DOI: 10.1109/JSYST.2017.2691408

Rizet C, Cruz C, Vromant M. The Constraints of vehicle range and congestion for the use of electric vehicles for urban freight in France. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;12: 500-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.005

Nocera B, Pungillo G, Bruzzone F. How to evaluate and plan the freight-passengers first-last mile. Transport Policy. 2020;49;1: 8-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.01.007

Hosseinpour S, Chen H, Tang H. Barriers to the wide adoption of electric vehicles: A literature review based discussion. 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2-6 Aug. 2015, Portland, OR, USA. 2015. p. 2329-2336. DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2015.7273259

Li Y. Infrastructure to facilitate usage of electric vehicles and its impact. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;14: 2537-2543. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.337

Figenbaum E. Perspectives on Norway's supercharged electric vehicle policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2017;25: 14-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2016.11.002

Earl T. Analysis of long-haul battery electric trucks in EU marketplace and technology, economic, environmental, and policy perspectives. Commercial Vehicle Workshop. 2018;8: 1718. Available from: 20180725_T&E_Battery_Electric_Trucks_EU_FINAL.pdf ( [Accessed 20th Jan 2021].

Mruzek M, Gajdáč I, Kučera L, & Gajdošík T. The possibilities of increasing the electric vehicle range. Procedia Engineering. 2017;192: 621-625. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.107

Ji S, et al. Electric vehicles in China: Emissions and health impacts. Environmental Science &Technology. 2012;46(4). DOI: 10.1021/es202347q

Lee D-Y, Thomas VM, Brown MA. Electric urban delivery trucks: Energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and cost-effectiveness. Environmental Science & Technology. 2013;47(14): 8022-8030. DOI: 10.1021/es400179w

Lebeau P, Macharis C, Van Mierlo J. Exploring the choice of battery electric vehicles in city logistics: A conjoint-based choice analysis. Research Part E: Transportation. Logistics and Transportation Review. 2016;91: 245-258. DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.04.004

Sadek BA, Martin EW, Shaheen SA. Forecasting truck parking using Fourier transformations. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems. 2020; 146(8). DOI: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000397

Altan MF, Ayözen YE. The effect of the size of traffic analysis zones on the quality of transport demand forecasts and travel assignments. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 2018;62(4): 971-979. DOI: 10.3311/PPci.11885

Quak H, Nesterova N, Rooijen TV, Dong Y. Zero emission city logistics: Current practices in freight electromobility and feasibility in the near future. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;14: 1506-1515. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.115

Kovács G, Gubán M. Planning of optimal fuel supply of international transport activity. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering. 2017;45(4): 186-195. DOI: 10.3311/PPtr.10843

Csonka B, Havas M, Csiszár C, Földes D. Operational methods for charging of electric vehicles. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering. 2020;48(4): 369-376. DOI: 10.3311/PPtr.15853

Duarte G, Rolim C, Baptista P. How battery electric vehicles can contribute to sustainable urban logistics: A real world application in Lisbon, Portugal. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 2016;15: 71-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2016.03.006

Ližbetinová L, Hitka M, Kleymenov M. Motivational preferences of employees in requirements of Czech and Russian transport and logistics enterprises. International Journal of Maritime Science and Technology. 2018;65(4): 254-258. DOI: 10.17818/NM/2018/4SI.17

Micieta B, Staszewska J, Binasova V, Hercko J. Adaptive logistics management and optimization through artificial intelligence. Communications-Scientific letters of the University of Zilina. 2017;19(2A): 10-14. Available from:

Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Khan M. Locating electric vehicle charging stations: Parking-based assignment method for Seattle, Washington. Transportation Research Record. 2013;2385(1): 28-36. DOI: 10.3141/2385-04

Battery electric truck and bus energy efficiency compared to conventional diesel vehicles. California Air Resources Board, May 2018.

Lebeau P, et al. Conventional, hybrid, or electric vehicles: Which technology for an urban distribution centre? The Scientific World Journal. 2015; 302867. DOI: 10.1155/2015/302867

Ramsey M. As electric vehicles arrive, firms see payback in trucks. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: [Accessed 4th Dec. 2020].

R&D Batteries, Inc. Valence Advance Energy Storage Solution,U-Charge® U1−12RT. Specifications. Available from: [Accessed 7th Mar. 2021].

Vijayagopal R, Rousseau A. Electric truck economic feasibility analysis. 2021;12(2): 75. DOI: 10.3390/wevj12020075

European Commission. Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. Clean transport, urban transport. Alternative fuels for sustainable mobility in Europe. Available from: [Accessed 9th Aug. 2021].

European Commission. Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport. Clean transport, urban transport. Alternative fuels for sustainable mobility in Europe. Available from: [Accessed 9th Aug. 2021].

Directive (EU) 2019/1161 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 amending Directive 2009/33/EC on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles. Official Journal of the European Union. Available from:

How to Cite
Qasim M, Csiszar C. Major Barriers in Adoption of Electric Trucks in Logistics System. Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(6):833-46. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i6.3922