An Evaluation Model for Foreign Direct Investment Performance of Free Trade Port Zones

  • Wen-Kai K. Hsu Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
  • Show-Hui S. Huang Department of Incentives, Conferences, Exhibitions and Trade Marketing, Shu-Te University
  • Nguyen Tan Huynh Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology; Faculty of Economics and Management, Dong Nai Technology University
Keywords: foreign direct investment, performance, fuzzy AHP, free trade port zone


With the tendency of internationalisation and globalisation, signing regional economic agreements among multiple countries has become a trend. Under such an integration environment, some free economic zones with port transportation functions have become crucial for FDI (foreign direct investment) investors in selecting investment locations. The free trade port zone (FTPZ) is argued to be one of the most well-known. This paper aims to assess the FDI performance of FTPZs. On the basis of the FTPZ's features and relevant literature, assessment criteria (ACs) are initially identified. An evaluation model based on the fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) approach is then introduced to evaluate the FTPZs' FDI performance from foreign investors' viewpoints. Finally, the FTPZ of the Kaohsiung port in Taiwan was empirically investigated to verify the assessment model. Results point out that for the FTPZ of Kaohsiung port, ACs with higher priorities needing improvement are raw material acquired, local government efficiency, and political stability and social security. Theoretical and practical recommendations for the FTPZ managers are discussed based on the results.


Bachmann C. Modeling the impacts of free trade agreements on domestic transportation gateways, corridors, and ports. Transportation Research Record. 2017;2611(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.3141/2611-01

Hsu W-KK, Kao J-C. The safety of ship berthing operations at port dock-a gap assessment model based on fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Maritime Engineering. 2017;159: A377-A92. DOI: 10.3940/rina.ijme.2017.a4.442

Lu CS, Liao CH, Yang CC. Segmenting manufacturers' investment incentive preferences for international logistics zones. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2008;28(2): 106-129. DOI: 10.1108/01443570810846865

Huang S-HS, Tseng W-J, Hsu W-KK. An assessment of knowledge gap in service quality for air freight carriers. Transport Policy. 2016;50: 87-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.06.006

Chang CC, et al. Discussing the coordination barriers between divisions of free port zones in Taiwan. Maritimes Quarterly. 2014;23: 69-85. DOI: 10.1057/mel.2016.4

Panova Y, Hilmola O-P. Justification and evaluation of dry port investments in Russia. Research in Transportation Economics. 2015;51: 61-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.07.008

Deng X, Wang Y, Yeo G-T. Enterprise perspective-based evaluation of free trade port areas in China. Maritime Economics & Logistics. 2017;19(3): 451-73. DOI: 10.1057/mel.2016.4

Lu C-S, Yang C-C. An evaluation of the investment environment in international logistics zones: A Taiwanese manufacturer's perspective. International Journal of Production Economics. 2007;107(1): 279-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.09.007

Yang Y-C. A comparative analysis of free trade zone policies in Taiwan and Korea based on a port hinterland perspective. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2009;25(2): 273-303. DOI: 10.1016/S2092-5212(09)80006-0

Chiu R-H, et al. An evaluation of free trade port zone in Taiwan. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2011;27(3): 423-45. DOI: 10.1016/S2092-5212(11)80020-9

Chen J, et al. Evaluation and comparison of the development performances of typical free trade port zones in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018;118: 506-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.09.009

Hsu W-KK, Lian S-J, Huang S-HS. An assessment model based on a hybrid MCDM approach for the port choice of liner carriers. Research in Transportation Business & Management. 2020;34: 100426. DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100426

Saaty RW. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling. 1980;9(3-5): 161-76. DOI: 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

Saaty TL. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Vol. 6. RWS Publications; 2000.

Hsu W-K, Huang S-HS, Tseng W-J, Li D-F. An assessment of the policy gap in port selection of liner shipping companies. Transportation Letters. 2021;13(4): 273-81. DOI: 10.1080/19427867.2020.1724648

Tseng W-J, Huang S-H, Zheng M-Z, Hsu W-K. Risk assessment of dangerous goods in airfreights. In: Lee T-CL, Wu C-HW, Lee PT-W. (eds.) International Forum on Shipping, Ports and Airports (IFSPA), 15-17 July 2015, Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Hong Kong: TRB Weekly; 2016. p. 1-19.

Wang Z-J, Lin J. Acceptability measurement and priority weight elicitation of triangular fuzzy multiplicative preference relations based on geometric consistency and uncertainty indices. Information Sciences. 2017;402: 105-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.03.028

Martilla JA, James JC. Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing. 1977;41(1): 77-9. DOI: 10.1177/002224297704100112

How to Cite
Hsu W-KK, Huang S-HS, Huynh NT. An Evaluation Model for Foreign Direct Investment Performance of Free Trade Port Zones. Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(6):859-70. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i6.3844