Comparative Voyage-Based Evaluation of Yacht Transfer by Self-Sailing and Cargo Vessel Shipment – A Pilot Study

Yacht Carrying

  • Duygu Ülker Istanbul University, Institute of Marine Sciences and Management
  • Birsen Koldemir Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Department of Maritime Transport Management Engineering
Keywords: efficiency, shipping, voyage cost, yacht carrying, yacht traffic


The seasonal domestic yacht traffic direction in Turkey from the Marmara Sea and South coasts of Turkey at the beginning of the Summer and opposite direction at the end of the Summer or beginning of the Autumn. Considering the long-distance and long sailing time between the routes of seasonal yacht moving, this study revealed whether the yacht carrying in domestic shipping can be feasible for yacht owners and ship owners. The technical and managing perspective of port and ship selection criteria are indicated for yacht carrying. Estimations are done for the selected sample ship and yacht model and selected loading/discharging ports. All of the voyage expenses are formulated and written in MatLab. The voyage costs of the sample ship and  yacht model are estimated to evaluate the feasibility of yacht carrying between the Bodrum and Haydarpaşa Port. The cost of a yacht carrying between the ports is  acceptable depends on the number of yachts, speed of yacht and yacht type carried. The long coastline and yacht traffic potential of Turkey  give the opportunity of effectiveness for shipping of yachts in the domestic line.


Karanci A, Guler I, Ergin A, Yalciner AC. Demand forecasting for yacht tourism planning in Turkey. Proceedings of Coastal Engineering Practice; 2011. p. 1078-1087. DOI: 10.1061/41190(422)87 [Accessed 6th May 2020].

Sariisik M, Turkay O, Akova O. How to manage yacht tourism in Turkey: A SWOT analysis and related strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;24: 1014-1025. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.041 [Accessed 15th Jan. 2020].

Dernek D, Koldemir B. A study about transportation of yachts by ships: Case study Haydarpaşa-Fethiye. Proceedings of the 3rd National Marine Tourism Symposium, İzmir, Turkey; 2016. DOI: 10.18872/DEU.b.UDTS.2016.0011 [Accessed 29th Nov. 2019].

Genc EP, Guler N. Assessment of Marinas in the Mediterranean and the Position of Turkey. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2006;18(3): 207-213. Available from: [Accessed 29th Nov. 2019].

Kalemdaroglu AE, Seker DZ, Kabdasli S. GIS based inventory of marinas on the coastal region of Turkey. Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS Congress, 12-23 July 2004, Istanbul, Turkey; 2004. p. 12-23. Available from: [Accessed 29th Nov. 2019].

Spliethoff Group. World Ocean Transport. Amsterdam; 2020. Available from: [Accessed 29th Oct. 2020].

MTI. Official Maritime Statistics of the Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure. Turkey Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure; 2020. Available from: [Accessed 5th Oct. 2020].

Kapidani N, Tijan E, Jović M, Kočan E. National maritime single window–cost-benefit analysis of Montenegro case study. Promet – Traffic&Transportation. 2020;32(4): 543-57. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v32i4.3422 [Accessed 14th Oct. 2020].

Burak S, Dogan E, Gazioglu C. Impact of urbanization and tourism on coastal environment. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2004;47(9-10): 515-527. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.07.007 [Accessed 15th Jan. 2020].

Koc E, Altinay G. An analysis of seasonality in monthly per person tourist spending in Turkish inbound tourism from a market segmentation perspective. Tourism Management. 2007;28(1): 227-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.01.003 [Accessed 15th Jan. 2020].

Aydoğan E, Kadıoğlu M. The place and importance of yacht tourism in the tourism sector. Journal of ETA Maritime Science. 2018;6(3): 243-254. DOI: 10.5505/jems.2018.83702 [Accessed 15th Jan. 2020].

Fagerholt K, Hvattum LM, Johnsen TAV, Korsvik JE. Routing and scheduling in project shipping. Annals of Operations Research. 2013;207(1): 67-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0888-1 [Accessed 10th Jan. 2020].

Murty KG, et al. DSS (Decision Support Systems) for operations in a container shipping terminal. Proceedings of the First Gulf Conference on Decision Support Systems, Council of Ministers General Secretariat, State of Kuwait; p. 189-208. Available from: [Accessed 10th Jan. 2020].

Murty KG, Liu J, Wan Y, Linn R. A decision support system for operations in a container terminal. Decision Support Systems. 2005;39(3): 309-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2003.11.002 [Accessed 10th Jan. 2020].

Fagerholt K. A computer-based decision support system for vessel fleet scheduling—experience and future research. Decision Support Systems. 2004;37(1): 35-47. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00193-8 [Accessed 10th Jan. 2020].

Van Hoorn F. Heavy-lift transport ships – overview of existing fleet. Proceeding of the Marine Operations Specialty Symposium, MOSS-32, Singapore; 2008. p. 1-9. Available from: [Accessed 13rd Dec. 2019].

Dernek D. [Cost analysis and efficiency of yacht transport in the cabotage line]. MSc. Thesis. Istanbul University; 2016. Available from: Turkish [Accessed 25th Nov. 2019].

Polo G. On maritime transport costs, evolution, and forecast. Cienc y Tecnol Buques. 2012;5(10): 19. DOI: 10.25043/19098642.57 [Accessed 25th Nov. 2019].

Hess M, Hess S. Multi-objective ship’s cargo handling model. Transport. 2015;30(1): 55-60. DOI: 10.3846/16484142.2013.791999. [Accessed 25th Nov. 2019].

Počuča M. Methodology of day-to-day ship costs assessment. Promet - Traffic - Traffico. 2006;18: 337-45. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v18i5.704 [Accessed 2nd Feb. 2020].

Ülker D. Evaluation of short-sea shipping networks in the Sea of Marmara for the earthquake transportation emergency management. 2nd International Disaster & Resilience Congress, 13-15 Oct. 2020, Eskişehir, Turkey; 2020. p. 231-235.

Marine Traffic. Voyage Planner 2020. Available from: [Accessed 22nd Feb. 2020].

Official Gazzete No. 359. [Cabotage act]. 1926.

Official Gazzete No:28572. [Regulation about Amending the Ports Regulation]. 2013. Turkish.

Revolver. Revolver 44GT 2020. Available from: [Accessed 22nd Oct. 2020].

Boatmag International. 44GT: A good shot for Revolver Boats 2014. Available from: [Accessed 22nd June 2020].

Grainer R. Ship operating costs: Current and future trends. 2017. Available from: [Accessed 18th May 2020].

Directorate General of Coastal Safety. [Tariff of light and life saving due]. 2019. Turkish.

Official Gazzete No:30991. [Act of fees general communique]. 2019. Available from: [Accessed 17th April 2020] Turkish.

Official Gazzete No:30995. [Custom General Communiquée]. 2019. Available from: [Accessed 17th Apr. 2020]. Turkish.

Official Gazette No:27249. [Notice on fees and principles to be applied in the framework of receipting waste from ships and control of wastes]. 2009. Available from: [Accessed 17th Apr. 2020]. Turkish.

Chamber of Shipping. [Tariff]. 2020. Available from: [Accessed 17th Apr. 2020]. Turkish.

TCDD. Port service costs for year 2020:76.

Official Gazette No:26812. Ship Agency Services Fee Tariff. 2008. Available from: [Accessed 17th Apr. 2020].

Koldemir B. [Determination of risky regions in strait of istanbul from the aspect of navigational safety; updating of the accident black points]. Journal of DEU Maritime Faculty. 2009;1(1): 17-26. Available from: [Accessed 18th May 2020]. Turkish.

Ülker D, Baltaoğlu S. Ship born oil pollution in Turkish Straits Sea Area and MARPOL 73/78. In: Ünlü S, Alpar B, Öztürk B. (eds.) Oil Spill along Turkish Straits Sea Area. Istanbul, Turkey: TUDAV; 2018. p. 363-370.

Koldemir B, Yapıcı M. [Protection applications of ship-genrated air pollution for reduction in Turkey and the world]. Proceedings of 1st National Ship Traffic Services Congress, Istanbul, Turkey. p. 97-110.Turkish.

Ülker D, Bayırhan İ, Mersin K, Gazioğlu C. A comparative CO2 emissions analysis and mitigation strategies of short-sea shipping and road transport in the Marmara Region. Carbon Management. DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2020.1852853

How to Cite
Ülker D, Koldemir B. Comparative Voyage-Based Evaluation of Yacht Transfer by Self-Sailing and Cargo Vessel Shipment – A Pilot Study. Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(5):755-66. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i5.3746