Study on Profitable Shared Parking Management Based on Day-to-Day Evolution Model

  • Duo Xu Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
  • Huijun Sun Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Keywords: shared parking, parking permit, parking spot allocation, profitable management


Parking problems are getting increasingly serious in the urban area. However, the parking spots in the urban area are underutilized rather than really scarce. There is a large number of private spots in the residential areas that have the potential of being shared. Due to its private nature, shared parking is usually operated by a profitable mode. To study the utilization of shared parking and its impact on the morning commute, this paper proposes an evolution model. The supply side is a profit-chasing manager who decides on the selling prices and the business scale, while the demand side refers to travellers who respond to costs and choose the trip mode. By analysing the behaviour (strategy) of both sides, the study covers: 1 - the attraction and competition between parking lots and trip modes, 2 - the utilization and user composition of the parking lots. By inducing two numerical examples, the conclusions are that 1 - managers can achieve maximum profit and optimal allocation through price adjustment and quantity control; 2 - publicity (system cost minimization) and profitability (profit maximization) are consistent under certain threshold conditions; 3 - competition exists between parking lots as well as trip modes; some parking lots are even in short supply; profitable management does not create a market monopoly.


Litman T. Parking Management Comprehensive Implementation Guide. Victoria, BC: Victoria Transport Policy Institute; 2011.

Axhausen K, Polak J, Boltze M, Puzicha J. Effectiveness of the Parking Guidance Information System in Frankfurt am Main. Traffic Energy & Control. 1994;35(5): 304-309.

Arnott R, Rowse J. Modeling Parking. Journal of Urban Economics. 1999;45: 97-124.

Vuchic VR. Transportation for Livable Cities. New York, NY: Routledge; 1999.

Shoup D. Cruising for Parking. Transportation Policy. 2006;13: 479-486.

Ayala D, Wolfson O, Xu B, Dasgupta B, Lin J. Parking slot assignment games. GIS '11 Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, 1-4, November 2011, Illinois, USA. ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS; 2011.p. 299-308.

Shoup D. Free Parking or Free Markets. ACCESS Magazine. 2011;1(38): 28-35.

Beijing Transport Institute. 2018 Annual Reports of Transportation Development in Beijing (in Chinese); 2018. Available from:

Stephen C. Price volatility high for Hong Kong parking spaces available. SCMP (South China Morning Post); 2015. Available from: volatility-high-hong-kong-parking-spaces

Inci E, Lindsey CR. Garage and Curbside Parking Competition with Search Congestion. Regional Science and Urban Economics. 2015;54: 49-59.

Qian Z, Xiao F, Zhang HM. Managing morning commute traffic with parking. Transp. Res. Part B. 2012;46(7): 894-916.

Qian Z, Rajagopal R. Optimal dynamic parking pricing for morning commute considering expected cruising time. Transp. Res. Part C. 2014;48: 469-490.

Crocker TD. The Structure of Atmospheric Pollution Control System. The Economic of Air Pollution. 1966;61: 81-84.

Dales JH. Pollution, Property, and Prices: An Essay in Policy-Making and Economics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1968. vii, 111 p.

Verhoef E, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P. Tradable Permits: Their Potential in the Regulation of Road Transport Externalities. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1997;24(4): 527-548.

Yang H, Wang XL. Managing network mobility with tradable credits. Transportation Research Part B. 2011;45(3): 580-594.

Zhang XN, Yang H, Huang HJ. Improving Travel Efficiency by Parking Permits Distribution and Trading. Transportation Research Part B. 2011;45(7): 1018-1034.

Liu W, Yang H, Yin Y, Zhang F. A Novel Permit Scheme for Managing Parking Competition and Bottleneck Congestion. Transportation Research Part C. 2014;44: 265-281.

Liu W, Yang H, Yin Y. Expiable Parking Reservations for Managing Morning Commute with Parking Space Constraints. Transportation Research Part C. 2014;44: 185-201.

Akamatsu T, Wada K. Tradable Network Permits: A New Scheme for the Most Efficient Use of Network Capacity. Transportation Research Part C. 2017;79: 178-195.

Wang J, Zhang XN, Zhang HM. Parking permits management and optimal parking supply considering traffic emission cost. Transp. Res. Part D. 2018;60: 92-103.

Wang J, Zhang XN, Wang H, Zhang M. Optimal parking supply in bi-modal transportation network considering transit scale economies. Transp. Res. Part E. 2019;130: 207-229.

Wang J, Wang H, Zhang XN. A hybrid management scheme with parking pricing and parking permit for a many-to-one park and ride network. Transp. Res. Part C. 2020;112: 153-179.

Shao CY, Yang H, Zhang Y, Ke JT. A simple reservation and allocation model of shared parking lots. Transp. Res. Part C. 2016;71: 303-312.

Xu M, Grant-Muller S. Tradable Credits Scheme on Urban Travel Demand: A Linear Expenditure System Approach and Simulation in Beijing. Transp. Res. Procedia. 2017;25: 2934-2948.

Xiao HH, Xu M, Gao ZY. Shared parking problem: A novel truthful double auction mechanism approach. Transp. Res. Part B. 2018;109: 40-69.

Xiao HH, Xu M, Yang H. Pricing strategies for shared parking management with double auction approach: Differential price vs. uniform price. Transp. Res. Part E. 2020;136: 101899.

Zhang C, Chen J, Li Z, Wu Y. Predicting owners’ willingness to share private residential parking spots. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018;2672: 930-941.

Liang JK, Eccarius T, Lu CC. Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City. Transp. Res. Part A. 2019;130: 799-812.

Ding H. Analyzing and modeling on-street parking choice behavior. MSc thesis. Beijing, CHN: Beijing Institute of Technology; 2016.

How to Cite
Xu D, Sun H. Study on Profitable Shared Parking Management Based on Day-to-Day Evolution Model. Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 2021;33(1):17-3. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v33i1.3481