Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics of Pilots Under Different Intentions in Complex Flight Environment
Abstract
Intention is the main embodiment of human cerebral conscious activities, which has an important influence on guiding the realization of human behaviour. It is a vital prerequisite for analysing the dynamic characteristics of pilots with different intentions. Considering the intention law of the generation, transfer and reduction, this paper analyses dynamic characteristics of pilots with different intentions, starting from the factors of effect on the intention. Taking airfield traffic pattern as an example for simulating flight experiments, the pilot’s multi-source dynamic data of human – aircraft – environment system under different intentions and their psycho-physiological-physical characteristics were recorded. Based on Matlab, one-way analysis of variance was used to extract variables with significant changes, and the variables under different intentions were compared and analysed. The results show that the conventional pilots are more conducive to control the aircraft to keep a stable flight attitude. This study is of great significance for perfecting the warning system of flight safety and improving the pilot’s micro-behaviour assessment system.
References
Degani A, Heymann M, Meyer G, Shafto M. Some Formal Aspects of Human-Automation Interaction. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center TM 2000-209600; 2000.
Crow J, Javaux D, Rushby J. Models and Mechanized Methods that Integrate Human Factors into Automation Design. Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics: HCI-Aero, 27-29 Sep 2000, Toulouse, France. Tolosa Press; 2000. p. 163-168.
Final Report of the Accident Investigation Flash Airlines Flight 604, Boeing 737-300, SU-ZCF, January 3, 2004, Red Sea near Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt. Egyptian Ministry of Civil Aviation, Final Investigation Report, Cairo, Egypt, 2004.
Report on Accident to Indian Airlines Airbus A-320 Aircraft VT-EPN at Bangalore on 14th February 1990. Indian Court of Inquiry, Indian Government, Final Investigation Report, New Delhi, India, 1992.
Wilson GF. An Analysis of Mental Workload in Pilots during Flight Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 2002;12(1): 3-18.
Schlimm KA. A Model for Situational Awareness in Aircraft Upset Prevention and Recovery. 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 22-26 June 2015, Dallas, TX; 2015.
Zhang L, Zhang W, Zhu Z, Ding L. Probing into the evaluation of flight training in special environment based on EMGs. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;3(18): 4493-4500.
Jia B, Wei CF, Mao JF, Law R, Fu S, Wu Q. Identification of flight state under different simulator modes using improved diffusion maps. Optik. 2016;127(9): 3905-3911.
Marinescu A, Sharples S, Rithie C, Sanchez LS, McDowell M, Morvan H. Exploring the Relationship between Mental Workload, Variation in Performance and Physiological Parameters. 3th IFAC Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems HMS. 2016;49(19): 591-596.
Olivari M, Venrooij J, Nieuwenhuizen FM, Pollini L, Heinrich H. Identifying Time-Varying Pilot Responses: a Regularized Recursive Least-Squares Algorithm. 2016 AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 13-17 June 2016. Washington, D.C; 2016.
Tavcar A, Kuznar D, Gams M. Hybrid Multi-Agent Strategy Discovering Algorithm for human behaviour. Expert Systems with Applications. 2017;71: 370-382.
Jaquess KJ, Gentili RJ, Lo LC, Hatfield B. Empirical evidence for the relationship between cognitive workload and attentional reserve. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2017;121: 46-55.
Lampton AK, Klyde DH, Schulze PC. Evaluation of a Missed Approach/Go-Around Spatial Disorientation Demonstration Scenario for Commercial Pilot Training. 2017 AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 9-13 January 2017, Grapevine, Texas; 2017.
Russi-Vigoya MN, Patterson P. Analysis of pilot eye behaviour during glass cockpit simulations. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015;3: 5028-5035.
Wang XY, Liu YQ, Wang JQ, Zhang JL. Study on Influencing Factors Selection of Driver’s Propensity. Transportation Research Part D. 2019;66(1): 35-48.
Sun R, Peng T. Design of Flight Cognitive Ability Measurement Scheme and Its Model. China Safety Science Journal. 2010;20(11): 47-51.
Hadder EM, Takahashi TT. Minimum Control Speed Estimation for Conceptual Design. 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, 5-9 June 2017, Denver, Colorado; 2017.
Copyright (c) 2020 Haibo Wang; Haiqing Si; Yao Li, Ting Pan, Yitong Zong, Naiqi Jiang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
