Impact of Railway Investment on Regional Development – Case Study of Pomeranian Metropolitan Railway

  • Cezary Mankowski University of Gdansk
  • Dariusz Weiland University of Gdansk
  • Borna Abramović University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences
Keywords: railway, region, investment, assessment


From the regional development point of view new investments are always of great importance as they are mainly expected to boost the regional economy and thus improve the living standard of inhabitants. Also for the literature purposes a new case study on the impact of investments on regional development can be perceived as an added value to the state of the art and thus worthy to be explored. In this research the impact is measured in the following aspects: social, economic, innovation, and environmental, which stand also for the main assessment criteria. Just recently, an opportunity has appeared to explore this subject on the Pomeranian Metropolitan Railway (PMR), which started its operations on 1st September 2015, after five years of construction works and more than a 100-year long history. Thus, the paper presents the impact results of PMR on the development of the Pomeranian region, in the form of qualitative as well as quantitative assessments in the four aspects and on different levels of detail. The final conclusion states that the impact of PMR on the regional development has appeared to be negative in 33% and positive in 67%.

Author Biography

Borna Abramović, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences

Associate Professor, Chair for Railway Transport Management


Kamińska T. Makroekonomiczna ocena efektywności inwestycji infrastrukturalnych na przykładzie transportu. [Macroeconomic assessment of the effectiveness of infrastructure investments on the example of transportation]. Gdańsk, PL: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego; 1999.

Wojewódzka-Król K. Transport a rozwój regionalny. [Transport and regional development]. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Ekonomika Transportu i Logistyka. 2015;55: 57-67.

Kaźmierski J. Logistyka a rozwój regionu. [Logistics and the regional development]. Łódź, PL: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego; 2009.

Blum U. The Effects of Transportation Investment on Regional Growth: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Papers of the Regional Science Association. 1982;49: 169-184.

Domańska A. Wpływ infrastruktury transportu drogowego na rozwój regionalny. [Impact of road transport infrastructure on regional development]. Warszawa, PL: Wyd. Nauk. PWN; 2006.

Impact of Transport Infrastructure Investment on Regional Development. Paris: OECD Publications; 2002. Available at: [Accessed 10th June 2018].

Ivanova O. The role of transport infrastructure in regional economic development. The Institute of Transport Economics (TØI). TØI Report 671/2003, 2003.

Tavasszy LA, Burgess A, Renes G. Final Publishable Report: Conclusions and recommendations for the assessment of economic impacts of transport projects and policies. IASON (Integrated Appraisal of Spatial economic and Network effects of transport investments and policies), Deliverable D10. Funded by 5th Framework RDT Programme. TNO Inro, Delft, Netherlands, March 2004. Available at: [Accessed 15th June 2018].

Regional Logistics Strategic Plan 2015-2018. Brazzaville: WHO Regional Office for Africa; 2015. Available at: [Accessed 27th July 2018].

Yu N. et al. The growth impact of transport infrastructure investment: A regional analysis for China (1978–2008). Policy and Society. 2012;31(1): 25-38.

Griškevičiūtė-Gečienėa A, Griškevičienė D. The Influence of Transport Infrastructure Development on Sustainable Living Environment in Lithuania. Procedia Engineering. 2016;134: 215-223.

Michniak D. Main Problems of Transport Infrastructure Development in Slovakia and Effects on Regional Development. Geographia Polonica. 2015;88(1): 21-39.

Popper K. Conjectures and Refutations. London, UK: Routledge and Keagan Paul; 1963.

Szreder M. O weryfikacji i falsyfikacji hipotez. [On verification and falsification of hypotheses]. Przegląd Statystyczny. 2010;2-3: 82-88.

Kauf S, Tłuczak A. Logistyka miasta i regionu: metody ilościowe w decyzjach przestrzennych. [Logistics of the city and the region: quantitative methods in spatial decisions]. Warszawa, PL: Difin; 2008.

Hansen J. A guide to the guidelines: The UNIDO method of economic project evaluation. World Bank, Washington, DC. Staff working paper No. SWP 166, 1973. Available at: [Accessed 7th July 2018].

Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy; 2014. Available at: [Accessed 7th July 2018].

EUNET/SASI Report. Socio-Economic and Spatial Impacts of Transport. Project funded by the European Commission under the Transport RTD Programme of the 4th Framework Programme, Contract: ST-96-SC037.

Marcial Echenique and Partners Ltd., Cambridge, UK; 2001. Available at: documents/eunet.pdf [Accessed 10th September 2018].

Konopacki T. (ed.) Kolej na PKM. Pomorska Kolej Metropolitarna. [Railway to PKM. Pomeranian Metropolitan Railway]. Gdańsk, PL: Wyd. Pomorska Kolej Metropolitarna SA; 2015. p. 13-17, 156, 172-173.

Studium Wykonalności. [Feasibility study]. Pomorska Kolej Metropolitalna Etap I – rewitalizacja Kolei Kokoszkowskiej” Faza II – realizacja przedsięwzięcia. Wielobranżowa koncepcja programowo-przestrzenna. BPBK, IK, DSC, Województwo Pomorskie, Gdańsk, PL; 2012. p. 18-20, 158, 229. Available at: [Accessed 7th July 2018].

Ledwoń M. Dofinansowanie projektu PKM zwiększone do 85 procent! [Co-financing of the PKM project increased to 85 percent!] Article at Portal of Pomeranian Voivodeship, Gdańsk, PL, 12.02.2015. Available at:

kolei-metropolitalnej-do-85-procent [Accessed 14 July 2018].

Pomorskie: elektryfikacja i nowy przystanek PKM - do 2023 r. [Pomeranian: electrification and a new PKM stop - until 2023]. Article at Portal Onet Tricity, Gdańsk, PL, 04.06.2018. Available at: [Accessed 14th July 2018].

Kołodziejski H. et al. Koncepcja funkcjonowania Szybkiej Kolei Miejskiej w Trójmieście i Pomorskiej Kolei Metropolitalnej w obsłudze transportowej obszaru metropolitalnego oraz integracji transportu publicznego w obszarze metropolitalnym i regionie, w tym integracji taryfowo-biletowej. [The concept of functioning of the Fast Urban Railway in the Tri-City and the Pomeranian Metropolitan Railway in servicing the metropolitan area and integration of public transport in the metropolitan area and the region, including tariff and ticket integration]. Gdańsk, PL: MZKZG, 2015. p. 8. Available at: [Accessed 15th July 2018].

Koprowski K. Niedźwiednik zyska nowe centrum przy PKM. [Niedźwiednik will gain a new center at PKM]. Article at Portal of, Gdańsk, PL, 13.10.2014. Available at: [Accessed 16th July 2018].

Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. Third edition. Paris: OECD Publications; 2005. p. 46.

Kuik J. Charakterystyka techniczna linii. [Technical characteristics of the line]. PKM Portal. Available at: [Accessed 14th July 2018].

Naskręt M. Kierowcy polubili parkingi Park&Ride przy linii PKM. [Drivers liked Park & Ride car parks at the PKM railway]. Portal of, Gdańsk, PL, 4.04.2016. Available at: [Accessed 14th July 2018].

Pezzey JCV, Toman MA. The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles. Resources for future, Discussion paper 02-03: 2002; p. 5, 14-15. Available at: [Accessed 24th July 2018].

Sustainable Development Strategies: A Resource Book. Compiled by B. Dalal-Clayton, S. Bass. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. New York: Paris and United Nations Development Programme; 2002. p. 11 - 13.

Raport Oddziaływania na Środowisko – Streszczenie. [Environmental Impact Report - Summary]. WYG International, PKM, Gdańsk, PL, 2002. Available at: 30.03.20111.pdf [Accessed 4th September 2018].

Piętak Ł. Review of Theories and Models of Economic Growth. Comparative Economic Research. 2014;17(1): 45-57.

Samuelson P, Nordhaus W. Economics. McGraw Hill Int. New York; 2009. p. 5-8, 438, 440-441.

Rus G, Inglada V. Cost-benefit analysis of the highspeed train in Spain. The Annals of Regional Science. 1997;31: 175-188.

Dijkman H, Koopmans C, Vromans M. Cost-Benefit Analysis of High Speed Rail. CPB Report 00/2, 2000. Available at: [Accessed 14th January 2019].

Abramović B, Badanjak D, Blašković Zavada J. The Feasibility of Introducing a New Safety System on Railways. In: 15th International Symposium on Electronics in Traffic ISEP 2007, Ljubljana; 2007.

Berechman J. The evaluation of transportation investment projects. Routledge; 2010.

Barić D, Čurepić D, Radačić Ž. Implementation of relevant methods in assessing traffic-technological projects. Promet – Traffic & Transportation. 2007;19(5): 329-36.

Amiril A, Nawawi AH, Takim R, Latif SN. Transportation infrastructure project sustainability factors and performance. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;153: 90-8.

Joumard R, Nicolas JP. Transport project assessment methodology within the framework of sustainable development. Ecological Indicators. 2010;10(2): 136-42.

How to Cite
Mankowski C, Weiland D, Abramović B. Impact of Railway Investment on Regional Development – Case Study of Pomeranian Metropolitan Railway. Promet [Internet]. 2019Dec.29 [cited 2022Jul.5];31(6):669-7. Available from: