Effectiveness of Automatic Section Speed Control System Operating on National Roads in Poland

Robert Ziolkowski

doi:10.7307/ptt.v31i4.3060

Robert Ziolkowski Bialystok University of Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v31i4.3060

Keywords: traffic management, section speed control, excessive speed, heterogeneity of speed

Abstract

Driving speed remains within the most important factors in road safety, and speed not only affects the severity of a crash but is also related to the risk of being involved in a crash. Inappropriate speed is responsible for more than a third of all fatal accidents occurring on roads. In Poland the problem of speeding drivers is widely present. Hence, effective speed management and enforcement of speed limits on existing roads plays an important role. Possible solutions for rural roads are very limited and are focused mainly on administrative speed limitations and speed cameras enforcement. However, due to their limited effectiveness new solutions are still being sought. High expectations are associated with the automatic section speed control system that has recently been introduced in Poland. The aim of this paper is to examine the efficiency of the automatic section speed control system on the basis of speed surveys collected on chosen national roads where the system for sectional speed control was first implemented. Conducted comparisons and statistical analyses included driver’s average speed, speed percentiles, the number of speeding drivers as well as speed heterogeneity. To evaluate the efficacy of the sectional speed system, speed measurements were also conducted on fourteen, similar in geometry and functional characteristics, reference national roads located in Podlaskie voivodship in Poland without any specific speed enforcement.

Author Biography

Robert Ziolkowski, Bialystok University of Technology

Robert Ziolkowski is an Assistant Professor at Bialystok University of Technology, Department of Construction and Road Engineering. He's received a PhD in road materials characteristics. He's finished postgraduates studies on "Chosen aspects of traffic safety and environmental protection in road design". He's a member of Polish Association of Engineers and Technicians of Transportation. His major interests include transport and traffic management, traffic safety and speed management, driver's behaviour, ITS. He's been publishing and presenting a number of scientific papers devoted to traffic safety and driver's behaviour issues in both national and international journals and conferences.

References

Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Routledge Tylor&Francis Group; 2016.

Elvik R. The Power model of the relationship between speed and road safety, update and new analyses. Institute of Transport Economics TOI, Oslo. TOI Report 1034/2009, 2009.

Aarts L, van Schagen INLG. Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: A review. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2006;38(2): 215-224.

Kloeden CN, McLean AJ, Moore VM, Ponte G. Travelling speed and the rate of crash involvement on rural roads. Australian Transport Safety Bureau ATSB. Report No. CR 204, 2001.

International Transport Forum. OECD. Speed and crash risk. Research report. International Traffic Safety Data and Analyses Group, 2018.

The Polish General Police Headquarters, Traffic Department. Road accidents in Poland in 2016. Warsaw; 2017.

Gaca S, Kieć M. Speed management for local and regional rural roads. 6th Transport Research Arena – TRA2016. 18 April 2016, Warsaw, Poland. Transportation Research Procedia: 4170-4179.

Gaca S, Kieć M. Effectiveness of a system of automatic speed control on national roads in Poland. 15th International Conference of Road Safety on Four Continents, 22-24 March 2010, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 2010. p. 890-900.

Jurecki RS, Jaskiewicz M. Analysis of road accidents in Poland over the last ten years. Scientific Journal Maritime University of Szczecin. 2012;32(104)z2: 65-70.

Lahrmann H, Brassoe B, Johansen J, Madsen J. Safety Impact of Average Speed Control in the UK. Journal of Transportation Technologies. 2016;6: 312-326. Available from: doi:10.4236/jtts.2016.65028 [Accessed 29th Jan 2018].

Hoye A. Speed cameras, section control, and kangaroo jumps - a meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2014;73: 200-208. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.001 [Accessed 28th May 2018].

Thomas L, Srinivasan R, Decina L, Staplin L. Safety Effects of Automated Speed Enforcement Programs: Critical Review of International Literature. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record. 2008;2078: 117-126. Available from: doi:10.3141/2078-16 [Accessed 28th May 2018].

Stefan C. Automatic Speed Enforcement in the Kaisermühler Tunnel (Vienna, A22 Motorway). Austrian Road Safety Board; 2006.

Ziolkowski R. Influence of traffic calming measures on drivers’ behaviour. 9th International Conference: Environmental engineering, Vol. 4, 22–23 May 2014, Vilnius. Available from: doi:10.3846/enviro.2014.180 [Accessed 12th May 2017].

Nicole N, Brandenburg S, Twisk D. Improving homogeneity by dynamic speed limit systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2010;4242: 944-952. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.05.002

Goldenbeld C, Van Schagen I. The credibility of speed limit on 80km/h rural roads: the effects of road and person(ality) characteristics. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2007;39(6): 1121-1130. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.aap.2007.02.012

Benes J, Pribyl O. Effects of highway management on traffic flow characteristics. Archives of Transport System Telematics. 2014;7(2): 14-18.

Wahlberg A. Driver celeration behavior and the prediction of traffic accidents. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2006;12(3): 281-296. Available from: doi:10.1080/10803548.2006.11076690 [Accessed 17th Apr 2018].