Compensation Decisions on Disruption Recovery Service in Urban Rail Transit
Abstract
Ride-hailing, in addition to a common mode of daily transportation, is an attractive option for evacuating stranded passengers and supplementing bus bridging in the early stages of an urban rail transit (URT) disruption. This paper proposes a service supply chain comprised of ride-hailing vehicles, ride-hailing platforms, and stranded passengers wherein the URT and ride-hailing chain together provide emergency evacuation services. The emergency evacuation service supply chain can be coordinated under an effort-based revenue sharing contract. A URT-dominated Stackelberg game model between the URT and ride-hailing platform is then formulated to optimize compensation decisions on the part of the URT; numerical analysis reveals critical factors affecting the said decisions. The main contributions of this paper are two-fold: first, it provides new information regarding collaboration between URT operators and ride-hailing platforms for stranded passenger evacuation, including a ride-hailing platform pricing strategy; and second, the URT compensation decision process is solved via Stackelberg game model while revealing an incentive coefficient parameter for the URT decision and solver.
References
Jespersen-Groth J, Potthoff D, Clausen J, Huisman D, Kroon L, MarĂ³ti G, et al. Disruption Management in Passenger Railway Transportation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 399-421.
Pender B, Currie G, Delbosc A, Shiwakoti N. Disruption Recovery in Passenger Railways: International Survey. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2013;2353(2353): 22-32.
Kepaptsoglou K, Karlaftis MG. The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms. Public Transport. 2009;1(4): 275-97.
Pender B, Currie G, Delbosc A, Wang Y. Proactive Recovery from Rail Disruptions Through Provision of Track Crossovers and Bus Bridging. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2012; 2275(-1): 68-76.
Pender B, Currie G, Delbosc A, Shiwakoti N. Improving bus bridging responses via satellite bus reserve locations. J Transp Geogr. 2014;34(34): 202-10.
Westerlund Y, Cazemier O. The use of taxis for special and integrated public transport in Sweden and the Netherlands; 2007.
Darmanin T, Lim C, Gan HS. Public Railway Disruption Recovery Planning: A New Recovery Strategy for Metro Train Melbourne; 2010.
Schuitema G, Steg L, Rothengatter JA. The acceptability, personal outcome expectations, and expected effects of transport pricing policies. J Environ Psychol. 2010;30(4): 587-93.
Zeng AZ, Durach CF, Fang Y. Collaboration decisions on disruption recovery service in urban public tram systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics & Transportation Review. 2012;48(3): 578-90.
Mokhlesian M, Zegordi SH. Application of multidivisional bi-level programming to coordinate pricing and inventory decisions in a multiproduct competitive supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 2014;71(9-12): 1975-89.
Yang ZJ, Chen SY, Chen XL, Gu LP. URT Emergency Facilities Location Problem Model in Consideration of Station Vulnerability; 2017.
Wang K, Li X, Xu G. Evaluation of Socio-economic Losses of Train Delay Due to Subway Accident. Urban Mass Transit. 2014.
Lin T, Shalaby A, Miller E. Transit User Behaviour in Response to Service Disruption: State of Knowledge; 2016.
Cachon GP, Lariviere MA. Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations. Manage Sci. 2005;51(1): 30-44.
Kicsiny R, Varga Z, Scarelli A. Backward induction algorithm for a class of closed-loop Stackelberg games. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;237(3): 1021-36.
Copyright (c) 2019 Yang Zhijie, xiaolong chen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).