Experimental Study for Optimizing Pedestrian Flows at Bottlenecks of Subway Stations
Abstract
In subway stations, bottlenecks are the narrowed areas that reduce pedestrian flows in channels. Because pedestrians at bottlenecks are forced to dense together, bottlenecks decrease flow efficiency and pedestrians’ transfer comfort and may trigger serious crowd disasters such as trampling. This study used pedestrian experiments to investigate the methods of optimizing pedestrian traffic at bottlenecks of subway stations. Three optimization measures were proposed and evaluated by analyzing the characteristics of pedestrian flows, including efficiency, smoothness, and security. In this paper, setting the rear sides of the bottleneck entrance as straight and surface funnel shapes is called straight funnel shape and surface funnel shape, respectively. Setting a column at a bottleneck is called the column obstacle. The results showed that when efficiency or security come first, a column on the left is recommended; when comfort comes first, a concave funnel is recommended; when comprehensiveness is prioritized, a column on the left is recommended. Moreover, the larger the volume, the optimization is more obvious. Although many bottlenecks cannot be prevented when subway stations are constructed, the proposed optimization measures may help ease their adverse effects by improving facility efficiency, smoothness, and security, and by providing recommendations for designing and managing subway stations.
References
Beijing Municipal Commission of Transport. Rail Transit Networks Operating Information Daily, 2015.
Helbing D, Molnar P. Self-Organization Phenomena in Pedestrian Crowds. Understanding Complex Systems, 1998:569--577.
Bolay K. Nichtlineare Phänomene in einem fluid-dynamischen Verkehrsmodell. Unpublished diploma thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 1998.
Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 2000, 407(6803): 487-490.
Helbing D, Molnár P, Farkas I J, et al. Self-organizing pedestrian movement. Environment & Planning B Planning & Design, 2001, 28(3):361-383.
Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S. Controlled experiments to derive walking behaviour. European Journal of Transport & Infrastructure Research, 2003, 3(1).
Hoogendoorn S P, Daamen W. Pedestrian behavior at bottlenecks. Transportation Science, 2005, 39(2):147-159.
Kretz T, Grünebohm A, Schreckenberg M. Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck. 2006, 2006(5):P10014.
Kretz T, Hengst S, Vortisch P. Pedestrian flow at bottlenecks - validation and calibration of vissim's social force model of pedestrian traffic and its empirical foundations. International Symposium of Transport Simulation. 2008.
Seyfried A, Passon O, Steffen B, et al. New insights into pedestrian flow through bottlenecks. Transportation Science, 2007, 43(3):395-406.
Guo R Y. Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2014, 415: 428-439..
Li D, Han B. Behavioral effect on pedestrian evacuation simulation using cellular automata. Safety Science, 2015, 80:41-55.
Hoogendoorn S P, Daamen W, Bovy P H L. Extracting microscopic pedestrian characteristics from video data. Paper presented at: Transportation Research Board annual meeting 2003; 2003 Jan 15-18, Washington, America.
Gérinlajoie M, Richards C L, Mcfadyen B J. The negotiation of stationary and moving obstructions during walking: anticipatory locomotor adaptations and preservation of personal space. Motor Control, 2005, 9(3):242-69.
Fujiyama T. Investigating use of space of pedestrians (working paper). Centre for Transport Studies, ucl: london, uk. 2005.
Curtis S, Manocha D. Pedestrian simulation using geometric reasoning in velocity space. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012. Springer International Publishing; 2014.
Cao X, Handy S L, Mokhtarian P L. The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation, 2006, 33(1): 1-20.
Townsend C, Zacharias J. Built environment and pedestrian behavior at rail rapid transit stations in Bangkok. Transportation, 2010, 37(2): 317-330.
Reynolds C W. Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. Game developers conference. 1999, 1999: 763-782.
Daamen W. Modelling passenger flows in public transport facilities. Deflt: DUP Science, 2004.
Wei-Guo S, Yan-Fei Y, Bing-Hong W, et al. Evacuation behaviors at exit in CA model with force essentials: A comparison with social force model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2006, 371(2): 658-666.
Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S P. Experimental research of pedestrian walking behavior. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003, 1828:20-30.
Seyfried A, Steffen B, Winkens A, et al. Empirical data for pedestrian flow through bottlenecks. Traffic and Granular Flow’07. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009.
Fernández R, Valencia A, Seriani S. On passenger saturation flow in public transport doors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 78: 102-112.
Sun, L., Yang, Z., Rong, J., Liu, X. (2014). Study on the weaving behavior of high density bidirectional pedestrian flow. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014
Yang H, Yuen R K K, Cheng X, et al. Effect of right-hand traffic rules on evacuation through multiple parallel bottlenecks. Fire Technology, 2014, 50(2): 297-316.
Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP). Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2003, 7(3), 23-67.
Li Dewei, Han Baoming. Pedeatrain traffic. Bejing: China Communication Press, 2011.
Copyright (c) 2018 Wei Luo, Lishan Sun, Liya Yao, Qingsheng Gong, Jian Rong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).