Retail Out-of-stocks in the Context of Centralized and Direct Delivery
Abstract
The delivery of the right product, at the right time to the retail store, only seems to be an easy process. The smallest problem can cause the out-of-stock (OOS) situation, which may prevent customers to buy products they were looking for. Consequently, it affects retailers and their suppliers through potential operational inefficiencies, sale losses and eventually the losses of their loyal customers. Starting from these problems, by using the data of a large Serbian retailer, this paper analyses out-of-stocks in the context of two alternative delivery systems, centralized and direct. For calculating OOS rates the perpetual inventory aggregation metrics was used, while the occurrence of out-of-stocks was modelled by the application of probit regression analysis. The results have shown that delivery system has a significant impact on the probability of a stock-out, indicating potential problems in the centralized system. In addition, the analysis included certain product and store characteristics that also significantly affect the average probability of stock-outs.
References
Fernie J, Sparks L, editors. Logistics and retail management: emerging issues and new challenges in the retail supply chain. 4th ed. London: Kogan Page; 2014.
Steinhart Y, Mazursky D, Kamins MA. The process by which product availability triggers purchase. Marketing Letters. 2013;24(3): 217-228. doi: 10.1007/s11002-013-9227-4
Corsten D, Gruen T. On shelf availability: An examination of the extent, the causes, and the efforts to address retail out-of-stocks. In: Doukidis GJ, Vrechopoulos AP, editors. Consumer Driven Electronic Transformation. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 131-149.
Aastrup J, Kotzab H. Forty years of out-of-Stock research and shelves are still empty. The International Review of Retail. Distribution and Consumer Research. 2010;20(1): 147-164. doi: 10.1080/09593960903498284
FMI, GMA. Solving the out-of-stock problem: A FMI/GMA Trading Partner Alliance Report. Denver, 2015.
Green M. Availability on the shelf: last great challenge for retail. Logistics & Transport Focus. 2004;6: 22-27.
Roland Berger Consultants. ECR – Optimal Shelf Availability: increasing shopper satisfaction at the moment of truth. Munich: Roland Berger Consultants, 2003.
Ku HH, Kuo CC, Fang WL, Yu YW. The impact of retail out-of-stock options on preferences: the role of consumers’ desire for assimilation versus differentiation. Marketing Letters. 2014;25(1): 53-66. doi: 10.1007/s11002-013-9241-6
Campo K, Gijsbrechts E, Nisol P. Towards understanding consumer response to stock-outs. Journal of Retailing. 2000;76(2): 219-242. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00026-9.
Frontoni E, Mancini A, Zingaretti P, Contigiani M, Di Bello L, Placidi V. Design and test of a real time shelf out of stock detector system. Microsystem Technologies. 2016; 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00542-016-3003-3
Grant DB, Fernie J. Research note: Exploring out-ofstock and on-shelf availability in non-grocery, high street retailing. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2008;36(8): 661-672. doi: 10.1108/09590550810883496
Ehrenthal JCF, Stölzle W. An examination of the causes for retail stockouts. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2013;43(1): 54-69. doi: 10.1108/09600031311293255
Lovreta S, Koncar J, Petkovic G. Marketing channels. Belgrade: Faculty of Economics Belgrade; 2006.
Trautrims A, Grant DB, Schnedlitz P. In-store logistics processes in Austrian retail companies. European Retail Research. In: Morschett D, Foscht T, Rudolph T, Schnedlitz P, Schramm-Klein H, Swoboda B, editors. European Retail Research. Heidelberg: Gabler Verlag; 2011. p. 63-84.
Planet Retail. European Grocery Retailing: change is the only constant. London: Planet Retail Limited; 2014.
Amato LH, Amato CH. Changing retail power and performance in distribution channels. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2009;37(12): 1057-1076. doi: 10.1108/09590550911005029
Fernie J, McKinnon A. The impact of changes in retail distribution on a peripheral region: the case of Scotland. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 1991; 19(7): 25-32. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000002958
Trautrims A. Management of In-store Replenishment Systems: An exploratory study of European retailers [PhD thesis]. Hull: The University of Hull; 2011. Available from: https://hydra.hull.ac.uk/assets/hull:4697a/content
McKinnon AC. The development of retail logistics in the UK: a position paper. Technology Foresight Programme: Retail and Distribution Panel. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University; 1996.
Kuhn H, Sternbeck MG. Integrative retail logistics: An exploratory study. Operations Management Research. 2013;6(1): 2-18. doi: 10.1007/s12063-012-0075-9
Sternbeck MG, Kuhn H. An integrative approach to determine store delivery patterns in grocery retailing. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2014;70: 205-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.06.007
Levy M, Weitz BA. Retailing Management. Irwin: Mc-Graw-Hill; 2012.
Pramatari K, Miliotis P. The impact of collaborative store ordering on shelf availability. Supply ChainManagement: An International Journal. 2008;13(1): 49-61. doi: 10.1108/13598540810850319
Kaipia, R, Tanskanen K. Vendor managed category management - an outsourcing solution inretailing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2003;9(4): 165-75. doi: 10.1016/S1478-4092(03)00009-8
Harrison A, Van Hoek R. Logistics Management and Strategy: Competing through the Supply Chain. 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall; 2008.
Wulfraat M. Direct store delivery versus centralized distribution. MWPVL; 2016. Available from: http://www.mwpvl.com/html/dsd__vs_central_distribution.html.
Otto A, Schoppengerd FJ, Shariatmadari R, editors. Direct Store Delivery. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
Otto A, Shariatmadari R. Direct Store Delivery: Understanding DSD in Sales and Logistics, Results of the “Global DSD Analysis”. Regensburg: University of Regensburg; 2008.
Dujak D. Retail supply chain management through centralized distribution. Business Logistics in Modern Management [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.efos.unios.hr/repec/osi/bulimm/PDF/BusinessLogisticsinModernManagement12/blimm1203.pdf
Grocery Manufacturers Association, AMR Research, Clarkston Consulting, Nielsen Company. Powering Growth through Direct Store Delivery. Washington: The GMA DSD Committee; 2008.
Fernie J, Grant DB. On-shelf availability: the case of a UK grocery retailer. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2008;19(3): 293-308. doi: 10.1108/09574090810919170
Aastrup J, Kotzab H. Analyzing out-of-stock in independent grocery stores: an empiricalStudy. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2009;37(9): 765-789. doi: 10.1108/09590550910975817
Angerer A. The Impact of Automatic Store Replenishment Systems on Retail [PhD thesis]. St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen; 2005. Available from: http://www1.unisg.ch/www/ edis.nsf/SysLkpByIdentifier/3123/$FILE/dis3123.pdf
Gruen T, Corsten D. A Comprehensive Guide to Retail Out-of-Stock Reduction in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods Industry. Colorado Springs: GMA, FMI, NACDS, P&G, University of Colorado; 2007.
Andersen Consulting. The retail problem of out-ofstock merchandise. Atlanta: Coca-Cola Retailing Research Council; 1996.
Arvis J-F, Saslavsky D, Ojala L, Shepherd B, Busch C, Raj A. Connecting to Compete – Trade Logistics in the Global Economy: The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. Washington: The World Bank; 2014.
Corsten D, Gruen T. Desperately seeking shelf availability: an examination of the extent, the causes, and the efforts to address retail out-of-stocks. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2003;31(12): 605-617. doi: 10.1108/09590550310507731
Condea C, Thiesse F, Fleisch E. RFID-enabled shelf replenishment with backroom monitoring in retail stores. Decision Support Systems. 2012;52(4): 839-849. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.11.018
Piramuthu S, Wochner S, Grunow M. Should retail stores also RFID-tag ‘cheap’ items? European Journal of Operational Research. 2014;233(1): 281–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.08.051
Copyright (c) 2018 Nikola Milicevic, Aleksandar Grubor, Nenad Djokic, Goran Avlijas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
