Comparative Analysis of Safety Performance Indicators Based on Inductive Loop Detector Data

  • Amir Reza Mamdoohi Tarbiat Modares University
  • Mohsen Fallah Zavareh Tarbiat Modares University
  • Christer Hydén Lund Institute of Technology
  • Trond Nordfjærn Gediz University, Izmir, Turkey
Keywords: safety performance indicator, headway, time to collision, stopping distance, conflict, inductive loop detector,

Abstract

Conflicts in traffic stream have been detected by different safety performance indicators. This study aims to empirically investigate the differences between different indicators in detecting rear-end conflicts and assessing the risk in an uninterrupted flow. Micro-level data of a 24-hr traffic stream (including 6,657 vehicles) were captured using inductive loop detectors installed on a rural freeway section. Different indicators (Time Headway (H), Time to Collision (TTC), Proportion of Stopping Distance (PSD), Deceleration Rate to Avoid Collision (DRAC) and Stopping Distance Index (SDI)) were used to measure each car following event in a bivalent state (safe/unsafe). Unsafe events associated with each indicator were detected and common unsafe events characterized by different indicators were identified. Temporal distributions of rear-end collision risks associated with each indicator at 15-min intervals were also compared. Finally, the 15-min risk values based on different indicators were categorized and compared across three levels (Low, Medium and High). Data mining and statistical techniques showed that while SDI is the single most conservative indicator, DRAC and TTC detect a few risky events but very equal ones. In almost all conflicts associated with TTC, headway is still lower than the critical threshold. However, there exist considerable risky events based on headway which are still safe according to TTC. Comparison of PSD and TTC also declares that almost all conflicts associated with TTC are also risky according to PSD.

Author Biographies

Amir Reza Mamdoohi, Tarbiat Modares University
Assistant Professor, Transportation Engineering Division, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty
Mohsen Fallah Zavareh, Tarbiat Modares University
PhD Student, Transportation Engineering Division, Civil & Environmental Engineering Faculty
Christer Hydén, Lund Institute of Technology
Emeritus Professor, Transport and Roads
Trond Nordfjærn, Gediz University, Izmir, Turkey
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology

References

Hauer E. Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 1997; Available from: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0080430538

Lord D, Mannering F. The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2010 Jun;44(5):291–305; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856410000376

Guido G, Saccomanno F, Vitale A, Astarita V, Festa D. Comparing Safety Performance Measures Obtained from Video Capture Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 2010 Oct 9;1(1):165–165; Available from: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29TE.1943-5436.0000230

Perkins SR, Harris JI. Criteria for Traffic Conflict Characteristics Signalized Intersections. Research Laboratories, General Motors Corporation; 1967; Available from: http://books.google.com/books?id=7-YxHAAACAAJ

Amundsen FH, Hyden C. Proceedings of The First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts. Oslo, TTI, Oslo, Norway and LTH Lund, Sweden; 1977.

Cunto FJC, Saccomanno FF. Microlevel Traffic Simulation Method for Assessing Crash Potential at Intersections. 2007 [cited 2012 Jun 5]. Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=802073

Hauer E, Garder P. Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1986 Dec;18(6):471–81; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001457586900205

Davis GA, Hourdos J, Xiong H, Chatterjee I. Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2011 Nov;43(6):1907–19; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457511001205

Laureshyn A. Application of automated video analysis to road user behaviour [PhD Thesis]. [Sweden]: Lund University; 2010.

Gettman D, Head L. Surrogate Safety Measures From Traffic Simulation Models, Final Report. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); 2003. Report No.: FHWA-RD-03-050; Available from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/03050/03050.pdf

Cunto F. Assessing Safety Performance of Transportation Systems using Microscopic Simulation [PhD Thesis]. [Waterloo, Ontario]: University of Waterloo; 2008.

Pirdavani A, Brijs T, Bellemans T, Wets G. Evaluation of traffic safety at un-signalized intersections using microsimulation: a utilization of proximal safety indicators. Advances in Transportation Studies. 2010 Nov;22. Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1090852

Laureshyn A, Svensson Å, Hydén C. Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: Theoretical framework and first implementation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010 Nov;42(6):1637–46; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457510001041

Minderhoud MM, Bovy PHL. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2001 Jan;33(1):89–97; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457500000191

Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2003 May;35(3):427–33; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457502000222

Oh C, Oh J, Min J. Real-Time Detection of Hazardous Traffic Events on Freeways. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2009 Dec 1;2129(1):35–44; Available from: http://trb.metapress.com/content/38081208638g3574/?genre=article&id=doi%3a10.3141%2f2129-05

Heijer T, Wiersma E, Polak PH. Proposed safety criteria for traffic control on motorways. Safety Science. 1997 Jun;26(1–2):141–54; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753597000350

Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Washington DC, USA; 2010. Available from: http://books.trbbookstore.org/hcm10.aspx

Mulder M, Abbink DA, Van Paassen MM, Mulder M. Design of a Haptic Gas Pedal for Active Car-Following Support. Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on. 2011 Mar;12(1):268 –279; Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5648353&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fstamp%2Fstamp.jsp%3Ftp%3D%26arnumber%3D5648353

Hayward J. Near misses as a measure of safety at urban intersections [Ph.D. thesis]. [University Park, PA.]: Dept. of Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University; 1971.

Svensson Ã…. A method for analysing the traffic process in a safety perspective [PhD Thesis]. [Lund, Sweden]: University of Lund; 1998.

Sultan B, McDonald M. Assessing the safety benefit of automatic collision avoidance systems (During Emergency Braking Situations). Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. Nagoya, Japan; 2003; Available from: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/75672/

Horst R. Time-to-collision as a cue for decision-making in braking. VISION IN VEHICLES-III. 1991; Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=347440

Allen BL, Shin BT, Cooper PJ. analysis of traffic conflicts and collisions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 1978;(667):67–74; Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=85806

Cooper DF, Ferguson N. Traffic studies at T-junctions, a conflict simulation record. Traffic Engineering and Control. 1976 Jul;17(7) ; Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=66554

Archer J. Methods for the assessment and prediction of traffic safety at urban Intersections and their Application in Micro-simulation Modelling [PhD Thesis]. [Stockholm, Sweden]: Division of Transport and Logistics, Royal Institute of Technology, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan; 2005.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). AASHTO Green Book, Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004. 5th ed. American Association of State Highway & Transportation; 2004; Available from: http://www.amazon.com/dp/1560512636

Cunto FJC, Saccomanno FF. Microlevel Traffic Simulation Method for Assessing Crash Potential at Intersections. 2007 [cited 2012 Jul 8]. Available from: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=802073

Cunto F, Saccomanno FF. Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2008 May;40(3):1171–9; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457508000055

Oh C, Park S, Ritchie SG. A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2006 Mar;38(2):295–301; Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457505001570

Annual Report on National Transportation Statistics (In Farsi). Tehran, Iran: Bureau of Information Technology, IRAN Road Maintenance & Transportation Organization, IRAN Ministry of Road and Transportation; 2011.

Azimi M, Zhang Y. Categorizing Freeway Flow Conditions by Using Clustering Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2010 Dec 1;2173(1):105–14; Available from: http://trb.metapress.com/content/d4402373p6x03550

SPSS Inc. The SPSS TwoStep Cluster Component: A Scalable Component Enabling More Efficient Customer Segmentation, Technical Report. Chicago, IL.; 2001; Available from: http://www.spss.ch/upload/1122644952_The%20SPSS%20TwoStep%20Cluster%20Component.pdf

Published
2014-04-26
How to Cite
1.
Mamdoohi AR, Fallah Zavareh M, Hydén C, Nordfjærn T. Comparative Analysis of Safety Performance Indicators Based on Inductive Loop Detector Data. Promet - Traffic&Transportation. 2014;26(2):139-4. DOI: 10.7307/ptt.v26i2.1273
Section
Articles