Comparative Analysis and Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation on Emergency Evacuation Test Methods for Urban Rail Transit Stations

  • Zijia Wang
  • Feng Chen
  • Xiaohong Li
Keywords: urban rail transit, station, emergency evacuation, comparison, pedestrian simulation

Abstract

The emergency evacuation test method of rail transit station not only affects the operation safety of the station, but it also has significant influence on the scale and cost of the station. A reasonable test method should guarantee both the safety of evacuation and that the investment is neither excessive nor too conservative. The paper compares and analyzes the differences of the existing emergency evacuation test methods of rail stations in China and other regions on the evacuation load, evacuation time calculation and the capacity of egress components, etc. Based on the field survey analysis, the desired velocity distribution of pedestrians in various station facilities and the capacity of egress components have been obtained, and then the parameters of pedestrian simulation tool were calibrated. By selecting a station for the case study, an evacuation simulation model has been established, where five evacuation scenarios have been set according to different specifications and the simulation results have been carefully analyzed. Through analyzing the simulation results, some modification proposals of the current emergency evacuation test method in the design manual have been considered, including taking into account the section passenger volume, walking time on escalators and stairs of the platform, and the condition in which the escalator most critical to evacuation should be considered as out of service.

References

WANG Yan-fu JIANG Jun-cheng: Research of Safety Evacuation from Subway Fire [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(7):26

WU Jiao-rong; FENG Jian-dong: CHEN Xiaohong. Comparative Study of Subway Station Evacuation Design of PR China and USA [J]. Journal of Tongji University, 2009, 37(8): 1035-1041.

GB50157-2003. Metro Design Code of China [S]

Cheng, Yi-Hsuan: A Study on Layout of Major Facilities in Transit Station [D]. Taiwan, National Chiao Tung University, 1999

NFPA130. Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems [S], 2007 Edition. NFPA, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471

Beijing Urban Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., LTD, Design Specification of Beijing Metro Line 15 [R], 2010

Transportation Research Board. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual [M]. 2003

Parisi, D.R., Dorso, C.O.: Microscopic dynamics of pedestrian evacuation [J]. Physica A. 354 (2005): 606-618

D. Parisi, R., Gilmana, M., Moldovana, H.: A modification of the Social Force Model can reproduce experimental data of pedestrian flows in normal conditions, Physic A. 388 (2009) 3600-3608

Johansson, A., Helbing, D., Shukla1, P.K.: Specification of a Microscopic Pedestrian Model by Evolutionary Adjustment to Video Tracking Data, Advances in Complex Systems. 25 (2008)

Cheung, C.Y., William H.K. Lam. Pedestrian route choices between escalator and stairway in MTR Stations [J]. Journal of transportation engineering, 1998(5): 277-285.

Shi, C. et al.: Modeling and safety strategy of passenger evacuation in a metro station in China. Safety Sci. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2010.07.017

How to Cite
1.
Wang Z, Chen F, Li X. Comparative Analysis and Pedestrian Simulation Evaluation on Emergency Evacuation Test Methods for Urban Rail Transit Stations. Promet [Internet]. 1 [cited 2024Apr.20];24(6):535-42. Available from: https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/1205
Section
Articles