Attitudes of Experienced Seafarers as Predictor of ISM Code Implementation: A Croatian Example

  • Darijo Mišković University of Dubrovnik, Maritime Department, Dubrovnik, Croatia
  • Igor Jelaska University of Split, Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia
  • Renato Ivče University of Rijeka, Faculty of Maritime Studies, Rijeka, Croatia
Keywords: safety performance variables, ISM Code implementation, multiple regression analysis

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to identify what attitudes towards safety performance indicators influence the attitudes towards successfulness of ISM Code implementation among contemporary seafarers. Secondly, the goal of the research was to obtain insight into the seafarer’s attitudes towards the current state of ISM implementation and safety performance. Consequently, a sample of N=330 seafarers was examined regarding their attitudes towards safety performance variables and ISM Code implementation. By using multiple regression analysis it was concluded that well designed and structured safety rules and procedures, positive work environment and adequate communication can make significant contributions to seafarers’ attitudes towards ISM implementation.

Author Biographies

Darijo Mišković, University of Dubrovnik, Maritime Department, Dubrovnik, Croatia

PhD Student

Igor Jelaska, University of Split, Faculty of Kinesiology, Split, Croatia

PhD

Renato Ivče, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Maritime Studies, Rijeka, Croatia

PhD

References

Department of Transport. Formal Investigation, mv Herald of Free Enterprise. London: The Stationery Office. Report of Court No. 8074, 1987. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/54c-1704ce5274a15b6000025/FormalInvestigation_HeraldofFreeEnterprise-MSA1894.pdf [Accessed 2nd September 2018].

International Maritime Organization (IMO). Available from: www. imo.org [Accessed 2nd September 2018].

International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (International Safety Management (ISM) Code), Revised ISM Code. International Maritime Organization (IMO); 2014.

Guidance for IACS Auditors to the ISM Code, IACS Recommendation No. 41, Revision 4. International Association of Classification Society (IACS); 2005. Available from: http://www.iacs.org.uk/publications/recommendations/41-60/rec-41-rev4-corr1-cln/ [Accessed 2nd September 2017].

Čorović BM, Djurović P. Research of Marine Accidents through the Prism of Human Factors. Promet – Traffic & Transportation. 2013;25(4): 369-377. Available from: doi:10.7307/ptt.v25i4.1210

Anderson P. Cracking the code: the relevance of the ISM code and its impact on shipping practices. London, UK: Nautical Institute; 2003.

Bhattacharya S. The effectiveness of the ISM Code: A qualitative enquiry. Marine Policy. 2012;36: 528-535. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.09.004

Lapalainen FJ, Kuronen J, Tapaninen U. Evaluation of the Ism Code in the Finnish Shipping Companies. Journal of Maritime Research. 2012;IX(1): 23-32. Available from: https://www.jmr.unican.es/index.php/jmr/article/download/164/160

Storkensen KV, Antonsen S, Kongsvik T. One size fits all? Safety management regulation of ship accidents and personal injuries. Journal of Risk Research. 2017;20(9): 1154-1172. Available from: doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1147487

Safety and Shipping Review 2017. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty; 2017. Available from: https://www.agcs.allianz.com/content/dam/onemarketing/agcs/agcs/reports/AGCS-Safety-Shipping-Review-2017.pdf [Accessed 20th October 2018].

Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2018. European Maritime Safety Agency; 2018. Available from: http://emsa.europa.eu/publications/technical-reports-studies-and-plans/item/3406-annual-overview-of-marine-casualties-and-incidents-2018.html [Accessed 20th October 2018].

Batalden BM, Sydnes AK. Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 2014;13(1): 3-25. Available from: doi:10.1007/s13437-013-0051-8

Reiman T, Pietikainen E. Leading indicators of system safety – Monitoring and driving the organizational safety potential. Safety Science. 2012;50(10): 1993-2000. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.07.015

Jalonen R, Salmi K. Safety performance indicators for Maritime Safety Management, Literature review. Espoo, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Applied Mechanics; 2009.

Reiman T, Pietikainen E. 2010:07 Indicators of safety culture – selection and utilization of leading safety performance indicators. Available from: https://www.vtt.fi/inf/julkaisut/muut/2010/SSM-Rapport-2010-07.pdf [Accessed 1st September 2018].

Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: http://www.tokyo-mou.org [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: www.parismou.org [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Riyadh Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: www.riyadhmou.org [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Mediterranean Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: http://197.230.62.214/Annual_rep.aspx [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Indian Ocean Memorandum Of Understanding on Port State Control. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: http://www.iomou.org/ [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control for West and Central African Region- Abuja MoU. Annual report 2015-2017. Available from: http://www.abujamou.org [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Port State Control in the Black Sea Region. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: http://www.bsmou.org [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Port State Control Caribbean MoU. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: http://www.caribbeanmou.org/ [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Latin America MoU. Documento Presenta do Por-Secretaría Del Acuerdo Viña Del Mar. Annual Report 2015-2017. Available from: http://alvm.prefecturanaval.gob.ar [Accessed 22nd October 2018].

Mengolini A, Debarberis L. Effectiveness evaluation methodology for safety processes to enhance organizational culture in hazardous installations. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2008;155(1-2): 243-252. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.078

Grabowski M, Ayyalasomayajula P, Merrick J, Harrald JR, Roberts K. Leading indicators of safety in virtual organizations. Safety Science. 2007;45(10): 1013-1043. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2006.09.007

Guldenmund FW. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety Science. 2000;34(1-3): 215-257. Available from: doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00014-X

Schwatka NV, Hecker S, Goldenhar LM. Defining and Measuring Safety Climate: A Review of the Construction Industry Literature. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 2016;60(5): 537-550. Available from: doi:10.1093/annhyg/mew020

Zohar D. Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations: Theoretical and Applied Implications. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1980;65(1): 96-102. Available from: doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96

Griffin M, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2000;5(3): 347-358. Available from: doi:10.1037fl1076-8998.5.3.347

Neal A, Griffin MA, Hart PM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science. 2000;34: 99-109. Available from: http://158.132.155.107/posh97/private/behavioral-safety/organizational-climate-Neal.pdf

Cooper MD, Phillips RA. Analysis of the safety climate and safety behavior relationship. Journal of Safety Research. 2004;35(5): 497-512. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2004.08.004

Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WH. Organizational Climate and Culture. Annual Review of Psychology. 2013;64(1): 361-388. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230628709_Organizational_Climate_and_Culture

Griffin M, Curcuruto M. Safety Climate in Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2016;3: 191-212. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296467983_Safety_Climate_in_Organizations

Flin R, Mearns K, O'Connor P, Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science. 2000;34: 177-192. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?-doi=10.1.1.321.6940&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Bhattacharya Y. Measuring Safety Culture on Ships Using Safety Climate: A Study among Indian Officers. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy. 2015;3: 161-180. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.enavi.2015.12.006

Wadsworth EJK, Smith PA. Safety culture, advice and performance. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety. 2009;07(1): 5-31. Available from: http://psych.cf.ac.uk/home2/smith/safetycultureadviceperf.pdf

Zohar D, Luria G. A Multilevel Model of Safety Climate: Cross-Level Relationships Between Organization and Group-Level Climates. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2005;90(4): 616-628. Available from: doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.616

Safety Climate Measurement User Guide and Toolkit Loughborough University. Available from: https://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/wwwlboroacuk/content/sbe/downloads/Offshore%20Safety%20Climate%20Assessment.pdf [Accessed 18th June 2017].

Civil Aviation Authority. Safety Health of Aviation Maintenance Engineering (SHoMe) Tool: User Guide. CAA PAPER 2003/11. Available from: https://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?catid=1&pagetype=65&appid=11&mode=detail&id=1129 [Accessed 18th June 2017].

Wu TC, Liu CW, Lu MC. Safety climate in university and college laboratories: Impact of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Safety Research. 2007;38(1): 91-102. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2007.01.003

Huang YH, Zohar D, Robertson MM, Gareabet A, Lee J, Murphy LA. Development and validation of safety climate scales for lone workers using truck drivers as exemplar. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2013;17: 5-19. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.trf.2012.08.011

Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace Safety: A Meta-Analysis of the Roles of Person and Situation Factors. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2009;94(5): 1103-1127. Available from: doi:10.1037/a0016172

Health and Safety Executive (HSE). A review of safety culture and safety climate literature for the development of the safety culture inspection toolkit. Research report 367, 2005. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr367.pdf

Reason J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2001.

Oltedal HA, Engen OA. Safety culture and safety management within the Norwegian-controlled shipping industry: State of art, interrelationships, and influencing factors. PhD thesis. Stavanger: University of Stavanger; 2011. Available from: file:///C:/Users/Korisnik/Downloads/Safetycultureandsafetymanagementwith-intheNorwegian-controlledshippingindustry.Stateofartinterrelationshipsandinfluencingfactors.pdf

Guidelines for implementing the occupational safety and health provisions of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2016. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@sector/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_325319.pdf [Accessed 15th May 2017].

Alexander ER, Helms MM, Wilkins RD. The Relationship Between Supervisory Communication and Subordinate Performance and Satisfaction Among Professionals. Public Personnel Management. 1989;18(4): 415-429. Available from: doi:10.1080/15531180903415939

Hoffman DA, Morgeson FP. Safety-Related Behavior as a Social Exchange: The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1999;84(2): 286-296. Available from: doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.2.286

Michael JH, Guo ZG, Wiedenbeck JK, Ray CD. Production supervisor impacts on subordinates' safety outcomes: An investigation of leader-member exchange and safety communication. Journal of Safety Research. 2006;37(5): 469-477. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2006.06.004

Bielić T, Ivanišević D, Gundić A. Participation-Based Model of Ship Crew Management. Promet – Traffic & Transportation. 2014;26(5): 437-443. Available from: doi:10.7307/ptt.v26i5.1502

Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management. 1986;12(4): 531-544. Available from: doi:10.1177%2F014920638601200408

Chang S-J, Witteloostuijn A, Eden L. From the Editors: Common Method Variance in International Business Research. Journal of International Business Studies. 2010;41(2): 178-184. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46526095_From_the_Editors_Common_Method_Variance_in_International_Business_Research [Accessed 01 April 2019].

Published
2019-10-28
How to Cite
1.
Mišković D, Jelaska I, Ivče R. Attitudes of Experienced Seafarers as Predictor of ISM Code Implementation: A Croatian Example. PROMET [Internet]. 2019Oct.28 [cited 2019Nov.19];31(5):569-7. Available from: http://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/3118
Section
Articles