Methodology of an Aircraft Accident Response System Assessment

  • Franc Željko Županič
  • Maja Meško
  • Iztok Podbregar
Keywords: aircraft accident, response system, intervention, recovery, investigation, crisis management

Abstract

The paper investigates the ability to learn from an aircraft accident as the opportunities for learning diminish with the decline in the accident rate. A safety compromising case is studied as the processes of aircraft accident intervention and recovery can degrade the ability of an aircraft accident investigation process to enhance aviation safety by revealing accident causation. In the case study an assessment of the Slovenian aircraft accident response system was made. For the purpose of evaluating the successfulness of aircraft accident intervention and effectiveness of recovery, a model of aircraft accident response system requirements has been developed. Based on non-conformances identified by the model of requirements, remedial measures are proposed for the enhancement of the aircraft accident response system operation. Criteria for the definition of the transition from accident intervention to recovery are derived from the assessment findings in a manner not to impede the aircraft accident investigation effectiveness and efficiency.

References

Rose, A.: »Free lessons« in aviation safety, Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, Vol. 76, No. 5, 2004.

Athiniotis, N., Lombardo, D., Clark, G.: On-site aspects of a major aircraft accident investigation, Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2009

Barbry, F.Y.: Exposure risks and intervention possibilities in solution criticality accidents, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society (USA), Vol. 63, 1991.

Holsti, K.: International Politics: A Framework of Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersy, 1995

Nickson, D., Siddons, S.: Project management disasters & how to survive them, K. Page, London, Philadelphia, 2006

Rosenthal, U., Charles, M., Hart, P.: The World of Crises and Crisis Management, in Rosenthal, U., Charles, M., Hart, P. Coping with Crises: The management of disaster, riots and terrorism, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1989

Rosenthal, U., Kouzmin, A.: Crises and Crisis Management: Toward Comprehensive Government Decision Making, Journal o Pubic Administration Research & Theory, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1997, pp. 277-304

Salmon, T., Alkadari, R.: Crises, Crisis Management an Crisis Prevention, in R. Carey and T. Salmon (Eds.), International Security in the Modern World, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1992

Dubrovski, D.: Krizni management in prenova podjetja, Fakulteta za management, Koper, 2004

Novak, B.: Krizno komuniciranje in upravljanje nevarnosti: priročnik za krizne odnose z javnostmi v praksi, Gospodarski vestnik, Ljubljana, 2002

Sistem varstva pred naravnimi in drugimi nesrečami. Available at http://www.sos112.si/slo/page.php?src= sv1.htm, 2011

Mei, R., Tingdi, Z., Xiaolei, L.: Research on accident rehearsal modeling, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2008.

Zhang, D.M., Lee, M., Wong, W-Y.: A knowledge-based approach to design of intervention strategies for incidents, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE SMC ‘99, Vol. 6, 1999

Grady, R.: Practical Software Metrics for Project Management and Process Improvement, Prentice Hall. 1992.

Ortega, M., MarÍa Pérez, M., Rojas, T.: Construction of a Systemic Quality Model for Evaluating a Software, Software Quality Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2004.

Vlada Republike Slovenije, Državni načrt zaščite in reševanja ob letalski nesreči, Ministrstvo za obrambo, Uprava RS za zaščito in reševanja, Version 4.0, 2004.

Cokorilo, O., Gvozdenovic, S., Vasov, L., Mirosavljevic, P.: Costs of Unsafety in Aviation, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol.16, 2010.

How to Cite
1.
Županič F Željko, Meško M, Podbregar I. Methodology of an Aircraft Accident Response System Assessment. PROMET [Internet]. 1 [cited 2019Dec.6];24(2):135-42. Available from: http://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/285
Section
Articles