A Coordinating Strategy for Biofuel Supply Chain under Disturbance Using Revenue Sharing Contract Approach
Biofuel is considered to be an important alternative energy in the future transportation. Its development is supported by the rest of the world. However, biofuel industry development is still very slow. From the previous research it is known that the supply chain coordination and other problems need to be solved to promote the supply chain ability. This paper studies biodiesel supply chain coordination problem from the view of disturbance management. It gives a disturbed coordination strategy which contains the optimal order quantity and the contract parameters. This paper has then verified the disturbed coordination strategy through using the actual data of Jiangsu Yueda Kate New Energy Co. Ltd. The result shows that when the market demand and the recovery cost are simultaneously disturbed, the coordination can make the biodiesel supply chain robust and the new strategy under the revenue sharing contract is better than the original one.
Fatih Birol. World Energy Outlook. International Energy Agency; 2007.
Ramos TRP, Gomes MI, Barbosa-Póvoa AP. Planning waste cooking oil collection systems. Waste Management. 2013;33(8): 1691-1703.
Demirbas A. Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy. 2007;35(9): 4661-4670.
Sana SS. Optimal contract strategies for two stage supply chain. Economic Modelling. 2013;30(1): 253-260.
Zegordi SH, Abadi IK, Nia MB. A novel genetic algorithm for solving production and transportation scheduling in a two-stage supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2010;58(3): 373-381.
Toktaş-Palut P, Ülengin F. Coordination in a two-stage capacitated supply chain with multiple suppliers. European Journal of Operational Research. 2010;212(1): 43-53.
Ma P, Wang H, Shang J. Contract design for two-stage supply chain coordination: Integrating manufacturer-quality and retailer-marketing efforts. International Journal of Production Economics. 2013;146(2): 745-755.
Jaber MY, Osman IH. Coordinating a two-level supply chain with delay in payments and profit sharing. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2006;50(4): 385-400.
Ertek G, Griffin PM. Supplier-and buyer-driven channels in a two-stage supply chain. IEEE Transactions. 2002;34(8): 691-700.
Munson CL, Rosenblatt MJ. Coordinating a three-level supply chain with quantity discounts. IEEE Transactions. 2001;33(5): 371-384.
Hu JS, Wang H. The Price Discount Contract Analysis of Three- Level Supply Chain Under Disruption. Chinese Journal of Management Science. 2007;15(3): 103-107.
Modak NM, Panda S, Sana SS. Three-echelon supply chain coordination considering duopolistic retailers with perfect quality products. International Journal of Production Economics. 2016;182: 564-578.
Panda S, Modak NM, Basu M. Disposal cost sharing and bargaining for coordination and profit division in a three-echelon supply chain. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. 2014;9(4): 276-285.
Govindan K, Popiuc MN. Reverse supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contract: A case for the personal computers industry. European Journal of Operational Research. 2014;233(2): 326-336.
Razmi J, Moghadam AT, Jolai F. An Evaluative Continuous Time Markov Chain Model for a Three Echelon Supply Chain with Stochastic Demand and Lead Time. IFAC-Papers OnLine. 2015;48(3): 248-253.
Cárdenas-Barrón LE, Treviño-Garza G. An optimal solution to a three echelon supply chain network with multi-product and multi-period. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2014;38(5): 1911-1918.
Shankar BL, Basavarajappa S, Chen JC, Kadadevaramath RS. Location and allocation decisions for multi-echelon supply chain network – A multi-objective evolutionary approach. Expert systems with Applications. 2013;40(2): 551-562.
Awudu I, Zhang J. Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16(2): 1359-1368.
Rajagopal D, Plevin RJ. Implications of market-mediated emissions and uncertainty for biofuel policies. Energy Policy. 2013;56: 75-82.
Markel E, Sims C, English BC. Examining the effects of uncertainty on second-generation biofuel investment by using a two stochastic process approach. 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, 2016, Boston, Massachusetts (No. 235827). Agricultural and Applied Economics Association; 2016.
Rozakis S, Sourie JC. Micro-economic modelling of biofuel system in France to determine tax exemption policy under uncertainty. Energy Policy. 2005;33(2): 171-182.
Akgul O, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. Economic optimisation of a UK advanced biofuel supply chain. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2012;41: 57-72.
Qureshi N, Saha BC, Cotta MA, Singh V. An economic evaluation of biological conversion of wheat straw to butanol: a biofuel. Energy Conversion and Management. 2013;65: 456-462.
Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(30): 11206-11210.
Hill J. Environmental costs and benefits of transportation biofuel production from food-and lignocellulose-based energy crops. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2007;27(1): 1-12.
Demirbas A. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review. Applied Energy. 2009;86: S108-S117.
Kou N, Zhao F. Techno-economic analysis of a thermo-chemical biofuel plant with feedstock and product flexibility under external disturbances. Energy. 2011;36(12): 6745-6752.
Awudu I, Zhang J. Stochastic production planning for a biofuel supply chain under demand and price uncertainties. Applied Energy. 2013;103: 189-196.
Yue D, You F. Fair profit allocation in supply chain optimization with transfer price and revenue sharing: MINLP model and algorithm for cellulosic biofuel supply chains. AIChE Journal. 2014;60(9): 3211-3229.
Kumarappan S. Biomass supply chains for biofuel production–Contracting issues. In: Sixth Annual World Congress on Industrial Biotechnology & Bioprocessing, 14 Jul 2009, Montreal, Canada; 2009.
Dal-Mas M, Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F. Strategic design and investment capacity planning of the ethanol supply chain under price uncertainty. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2011;35(5): 2059-2071.
Mapemba LD, Epplin FM, Huhnke RL, Taliaferro CM. Herbaceous plant biomass harvest and delivery cost with harvest segmented by month and number of harvest machines endogenously determined. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2008;32(11): 1016-1027.
Zhang Y, and Jiang Y. Robust optimization on sustainable biodiesel supply chain produced from waste cooking oil under price uncertainty. Waste Management. 2017;60: 329-339.
Jiang B, Li J, Mao X. Container ports multimodal transport in China from the view of low carbon. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 2012;28(3): 321-343.
Ou X, Zhang X, Chang S, Guo Q. Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People’s Republic of China. Applied Energy. 2009;86: S197-S2
Copyright (c) 2018 Nana Geng, Yong Zhang, Yixiang Sun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).