Traffic Calming Measures: An Evaluation of the Effect on Driving Speed

  • Audrius Vaitkus Vilnius Gedimino technical university
  • Donatas Čygas Vilnius Gedimino technical university
  • Vilma Jasiūnienė Vilnius Gedimino technical university
  • Laura Jateikienė Vilnius Gedimino technical university
  • Tadas Andriejauskas Vilnius Gedimino technical university
  • Dovydas Skrodenis Vilnius Gedimino technical university
  • Kornelija Ratkevičiūtė Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Keywords: traffic calming measures, speed hump, gateway, road safety, public opinion,

Abstract

Road accidents are one of the leading causes of death in the world, particularly among young people. Excessive speed is one of the main risk factors in road traffic safety, increasing accident probability and affecting accident severity. Experimental research of the traffic calming measures allocation effect on the driving speed is presented in this paper. The research has been carried out on two aspects. The first one with respect to the mean speed and the second one regarding instantaneous speed. However, the paper is not only restricted by the above research. Standardized survey interview and questioning, a survey of public opinion, was carried out to find out the road users’ opinions about the need for traffic calming measures and speed control measures. Finally, the authors presented their insights and recommendations for the installation of speed humps and gateways and their optimum spacing.

Author Biographies

Audrius Vaitkus, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Road Research Institute, Director
Donatas Čygas, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Departament of Roads, Proffesor
Vilma Jasiūnienė, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Road Research Institute, Researcher
Laura Jateikienė, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Road Research Institute, Researcher
Tadas Andriejauskas, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Road Research Institute, Researcher
Dovydas Skrodenis, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Road Research Institute, Engineer
Kornelija Ratkevičiūtė, Vilnius Gedimino technical university
Road Research Institute, Researcher

References

Nilsson G. The effects of speed limits on traffic accidents in Sweden. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Effects of Speed Limits on Traffic Accidents and Transport Energy Use; 1981 Oct 6-8; Dublin, Ireland. Paris: OECD; 1981. p. 1-8.

Wegman F, Aarts L, editors. Advancing Sustainable Safety; National Road Safety Outlook for 2005−2020. Leidschendam: SWOV; 2006.

Elvik R. The Power Model of the Relationship between Speed and Road Safety. Update and New Analyses. Report 1034. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo; 2009.

Joint Transport Research Centre. Speed Management. Summary Document; 2006. p. 20.

WHO. Global Status Report on Road Safety; 2015. p. 340.

European Union. Statistics – accidents data. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/statistics/index_en.htm [Accessed 13th May 2016]

National Plan of Action for Road Traffic Safety 2014-2017. Norway; p. 30.

Waltz FH, Hoefliger M, Fehlmann W. Speed Limit Reduction from 60 to 50 km/h and Pedestrian Injuries. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Step Car Crash Conference. International Research Council on Biokinetics of Impacts (IRCOBI). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers; p. 311-318.

Van Houten R, Van Huten F. The Effects of a Specific Prompting Sign on Speed Reduction. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 1987;19(2):115-117. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(87)90030-3

Pennsylvania’s Traffic Calming Handbook. Pennsylvania Departament of Transportation. Publication No. 383; 2012. p. 109.

Traffic Calming Guidelines. The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT); 2009. p. 35.

Recommendations on the Design and Use of Engineering Safety Measures RISEP 10. 2010. Lithuanian Road Administration under the Ministry of Transport and Communications; p. 123.

Johansson C, Rosander P, Leden L. Distance between speed humps and pedestrian crossings: Does it matter? Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2011;43(5):1846-1851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.020

Garcia A, Torres AJ, Romero MA, Moreno AT. Traffic Microsimulation Study to Evaluate the Effect of Type and Spacing of Traffic Calming Devices on Capacity. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 1987;16:270-281.

Moreno AT, Garcia A. Use of Speed Profile as Surrogate Measure: Effect of Traffic Calming Devices on Crosstown Road Safety Performance. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013;61:23-32. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.10.013

Yannis G, Kondyli A, Georgopoulou X. Investigation of the Impact of Low Cost Traffic Engineering Measures on Road Safety in Urban Areas. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 2014;21(2):181-189. doi:10.1080/17457300.2013.796387

Antić B, Pešić D, Vujanić M, Lipovac K. The Influence of Speed Bumps Heights to the Decrease of the Vehicle Speed – Belgrade Experience. Safety Science. 2013;57:303-312. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.008

Chen L, Chen C, Ewing R, McKnight EM, Srinivasan R, Roe M. Safety Countermeasures and Crash Reduction in New York City-Experience and Lessons Learned. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013;50:312-322. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.009

Rahman F, Kojima A, Kubota H. Investigation on North

American Traffic Calming Devices Selection Practices.

IATSS Research. 2009;33(2):105-119. doi:10.1016/

S0386-1112(14)60249-1

Ariën C, Jongen EMM, Brijs K, Brijs T, Daniels S, Wets G. A Simulator Study on the Impact of Traffic Calming Measures in Urban Areas on Driving Behavior and Workload. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2013;61:43-53. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.044.

Lantieri C, Lamperti R, Simone A, Costa M, Vignali V, Sangiorgi C, Dondi G. Gateway Design Assessment in the Transition from High to Low Speed Areas. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology

and Behaviour. 2015;34:41-53. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.07.017

Galante F, Mauriello F, Montella A, Pernetti M, Aria M, D’Ambrosio A. Traffic Calming around Rural Highways Crossing Small Urban Communities: Driving Simulator Experiment. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2010;42(6):1585-1594. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.03.017.

Ariën C, Brijs K, Brijs T, Ceulemans W, Vanroelen G, Jongen EMM, Daniels S, Wets G. Does the Effect of Traffic Calming Measures Endure over Time? – A Simulator Study on the Influence of Gates. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2014;22:63-75. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2013.10.010

Čygaitė L, Jasiūnienė V, Žolynas A. The Analysis of Implementation Possibilities of Sectorial Automated Vehicle Speed Control Systems on the Roads of Lithuania. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering. 2014;9(2):131-138. doi:10.3846/bjrbe.2014.17

Čygaitė L, Lingytė I, Andriejauskas T, Vaitkus A. Analysis and Evaluation of Effectiveness of Speed Calming Measures in Lithuanian State Roads. XXVIII International Baltic Road Conference, 26-28 August 2013, Vilnius, Lietuva. Vilnius: Baltic Road Association; 2013. p. 1-8.

Čygaitė L, Lingytė I, Strumskys M. Analysis of Vertical Traffic Calming Measures in Impacts on Road Safety and Environment in Lithuania State Roads. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference „Environmental Engineering“, 22-23 May 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania: selected papers. Vilnius: Technika; 2014.

Published
2017-06-28
How to Cite
1.
Vaitkus A, Čygas D, Jasiūnienė V, Jateikienė L, Andriejauskas T, Skrodenis D, Ratkevičiūtė K. Traffic Calming Measures: An Evaluation of the Effect on Driving Speed. PROMET [Internet]. 2017Jun.28 [cited 2019Dec.6];29(3):275-8. Available from: http://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/2265
Section
Articles