Can Mobility Management Campaigning Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour in General? Development of an Analytical Tool

  • Lena Winslott Hiselius Lund University
Keywords: attitudes, change of behaviour, MaxSEM, Mobility Management,

Abstract

This paper brings to the fore the importance of a holistic approach to attaining a general pro-environmental behavioural change in order to reduce carbon emissions and the need to strive for a spillover of pro-environmental behaviour from one area to another. An adjusted version of the MaxSEM model is developed to capture differences in stages of behavioural change regarding environmental load on entering a Mobility Management campaign and one year after. The analytical tool is applied on two test samples in order to illustrate the tool and possible difficulties and methodological challenges. The test samples consist of participants in Mobility Management campaigns with personal incentives in two cities in Sweden. The application of the tool indicates e.g. that the timing of the survey is important and that there is need to upscale the MM-campaigns, in order to further discuss and analyse the effects of voluntary mobility measures in other domains.

Author Biography

Lena Winslott Hiselius, Lund University
Department of Technology and Society, Transport and Roads

References

Cairns S, Sloman L, Newson C, Anable J, Kirkbride A, Goodwin P. Smarter choices: assessing the potential to achieve traffic reduction using 'soft measures'. Transport Reviews, 2008;28(5):593-618.

Möser G, Bamberg S. The effectiveness of soft transport policy measures: A critical assessment and meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008;28(1):10–26.

Taniguchi A, Fujii S. Process model of voluntary behaviour modification and effects of travel feedback programs. Transportation Research Record. 2007;2010:45–52.

RED: Evaluation of Australian Travel Smart Projects in the ACT, South Australia, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia: 2001–2005. Report to the Australian Green house Office; 2005.

Jones P. Acceptability of road user charging: Meeting the challenge. In: Schade J, Schlag B, editors. Acceptability of transport pricing strategies. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. p. 27-62.

Brög W, Erl E, Ker I, Ryle J, Wall R. Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences from three continents. Transport Policy. 2009;16(6):281-292.

Ker I. Travel demand management: Public transport business case. Victoria, Canada: Contract Report RC5051 for Department of Infrastructure; 2003.

Bonsall P. Do we know whether personal travel planning really works? Transport Policy. 2009;16(6):306–314.

Stopher P, Clifford E, Swann N, Zhang Y. Evaluating voluntary travel behaviour change - suggested guidelines and case studies. Transport Policy. 2009;16(6):315–324.

Berger IE. The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behaviour. Environment and Behaviour. 1997;29(4):515-531.

Frey BS. Morality and rationality in environmental policy. Journal of Consumer Policy. 1999;22(4):395-417.

Thøgersen J. Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1999;20(1):53–81.

Bem DJ. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press; 1971. p. 1–62.

Thogersen J, Ölander F. Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2002;23(5):605-630.

Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson; 1957.

Steg L, Vlek C. Car use as a social dilemma: conditions for behaviour change in reducing the use of motor vehicles. Proceedings of the PTRC congress, part C: 'Sustainable Transport', London; 1996.

Thøgersen J. A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2004;24(1):93–103.

Thøgersen J, Crompton T. Simple and Painless? The Limitations of Spillover in Environmental Campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2009;32:141-163.

Diekmann A, Preisendörfer P. Environmental behavior: Discrepancies between aspirations and reality. Rationality and Society. 1998;10:79–102.

Gatersleben B, Steg L, Vlek C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior. 2002;34(3):335–362.

Bratt C. Consumers environmental behavior: Generalized, sector-based, or compensatory?. Environment and Behavior. 1999;31:28–44.

Thøgersen J, Ölander F. Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2003;23(3):225–236.

De Young R. Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56(3):509–526.

Barr S, Gilg A. Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental

action in and around the home. Geoforum. 2006;37(6):906-920.

Stern PC, Oskamp S. Managing scare environmental resources. In: Stokols D, Altman I, editors. Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 2; 1987. p. 1043-1088.

Steg L, Vlek C. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2009;29(3):309-317.

Atterbrand A-S, Jorde B, Kasin O, Krag T, Silfverberg B, Skur J, Stenvall M. Mobility Management in the Nordic Countries. TemaNord 539; 2005.

Barr S, Shaw G, Coles T, Prillwitz J. A holiday is a holiday: practising sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography. 2010;18(3):474-481.

MAX SUCCESS: Work Package B. Final report. Available from: http://www.max-success.eu/downloads/MAX_WPB_FinalReport.pdf

Van Acker V, Van Cauwenberge B, Witlox F. Max:SUMO: A New Expert Approach for Evaluating Mobility Management Projects. Promet -Traffic & Transportation. 2013;25(3):285-294.

Bamberg S, Fujii S, Friman M, Gärling T. Behaviour Theory and Soft Transport Policy Measures. Transport Policy. 2011;18(1):228-235.

Bamberg S. Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: A stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2013;34:151–159.

Hi HA, Greenberg S, Huang EM. One size does not fit all: Applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2010.

Doppelt R. The Power of Sustainable Thinking: How to Create a Positive Future for the Climate, The Planet, Your Organization and Your Life. Earthscan Publishing, UK; 2008.

City of Malmö. Malmöbornas resvanor och attityder till trafik och miljö 2008. City of Malmö; 2009.

Corral-Verdugo V. Dual “realities” of conservation behaviour: self-reports vs observations of re-use and recycling behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1997;17(2):135-145.

Warriner GK, McDougall GH, Claxton JD. Any data or none at all? Living with inaccuracies in self-reports of residential energy consumption. Environment and Behaviour. 1984;16(4):503-526.

Chatterjee K. A comparative evaluation of large-scale personal travel planning projects in England. Transport Policy. 2009;16(6):293-305.

Published
2014-06-16
How to Cite
1.
Winslott Hiselius L. Can Mobility Management Campaigning Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour in General? Development of an Analytical Tool. PROMET [Internet]. 2014Jun.16 [cited 2019Dec.6];26(3):257-64. Available from: http://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/1374
Section
Articles